Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.11.2025 CIAC AGENDA PACKET NOTE: As authorized by Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee may enter into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the Town Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM PRESENT B. CITIZEN COMMENTS C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES C.1. Discuss, consider and act to approve the June 11, 2025 Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes. D. RECEIVE PRESENTATION AND ACTION ITEM D.1. Receive presentation regarding roadway, water, and wastewater impact fee calculations and benchmarking with peer cities; and Discuss, consider and act to make recommendation to Town Council regarding Impact Fees. E. REVIEW MEETING CALENDAR TO ADD, AMEND OR CANCEL MEETINGS AS NEEDED F. ADJOURNMENT I certify that the above notice was posted on the bulletin board at Town of Westlake, Town Hall, located at 1500 Solana Blvd., Building 7, Suite 7100, Westlake, TX 76262, in compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. ________________________________ Recording Secretary Disabilities Notice: If you plan to attend the meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please contact the Town Secretary's Office 48 hours in advance at Ph. 817-490-5711 and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Town of Westlake Council Chamber, 1500 Solana Blvd Building 7, Suite 7100 Westlake, TX 76262 Monday, August 11, 2025, 5:00 PM AGENDA Page 1 of 40 AGENDA ITEM NO: C.1. Date: August 11, 2025 From: Dianna Buchanan, Town Secretary Item Name: Discuss, consider and act to approve the June 11, 2025 Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes. Attachments: 1. 6.11.25 CIAC Draft Minutes Summary: The June 11, 2025 Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes are attached for review and consideration of approval. Background: Approval of meeting minutes is a formal process ensuring accuracy, transparency, and compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act. Meeting minutes must document a quorum being present, accurately reflect the meeting's proceedings, and record specific actions taken. Upon approval and execution, the minutes become the official transcript and permanent record of the meeting. Minutes of open meetings are considered public records and are available upon approval for inspection as outlined by the Texas Public Information Act upon request to the Town Secretary's Office or by accessing through the Town of Westlake's website at www.westlake-tx.org. Fiscal Impact: N/A Legal Review: N/A Planning and Zoning Commission: Staff recommends approval of the minutes as presented. Capital Improvement Advisory Committee AGENDA ITEM REPORT Page 2 of 40                                        Page 3 of 40             Page 4 of 40 THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE OISTINCTIVC BY DESIGN Capital Improvement Advisory Committee AGENDA ITEM REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO: D.1. Date: August 11, 2025 From: Cheryl Taylor, P.E., Director, Public Works Item Name: Receive presentation regarding roadway, water, and wastewater impact fee calculations and benchmarking with peer cities; and Discuss, consider and act to make recommendation to Town Council regarding Impact Fees. Attachments: 1. Presentation Impact Fee Cales & Benchmarking Summary: Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires the appointment of a Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) to review impact fee calculations proposed for the potential adoption of impact fees and make recommendation(s) to the Town Council. Background: As a rapidly growing community, the Town of Westlake has an opportunity to consider the implementation of water, wastewater and roadway impact fees that will allow for development to participate in the cost of necessary future improvements to serve the community. An impact fee is a charge or assessment on new development that generates revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions attributable to new development. It is a tool that can be used to recoup, from property developers, some of the costs that new development places on City infrastructure. Impact fees ensure that those who place additional demand on the roadway, water, and wastewater systems help pay the costs required to meet that demand. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee to: 1.Advise and assist the Town Council in adopting land use assumptions; 2.Review the capital improvement plan (CIP) and file written comments; 3.Monitor and evaluate implementation of the CIP; 4.File semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the CIP and report to the Town Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee; and 5.Advise the Town Council of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, CIP, and impact fee. Town Council consideration for adoption of impact fees is anticipated before September 1, 2025. Page 5 of 40 Fiscal Impact: N/A Legal Review: N/A Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the CIAC provide a recommendation to the Town Council for approval of the roadway, water and wastewater impact fee calculations. Page 6 of 40 Impact Fee Calculations and Benchmarking Water, Wastewater, and Roadway Impact Fee Program August 11, 2025 Page 7 of 40 2 AGENDA •Impact Fee Basics •Role of CIAC •Impact Fee Calculation •Benchmarking Charts •Next Steps •Action Items CIAC – Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Page 8 of 40 3 BASICS OF IMPACT FEES 3 Page 9 of 40 ROLE AS CIAC Provide Comment: •Land Use Assumptions (LUA) •Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plans (IFCIP) •Impact Fee Calculations •Written Recommendation to Town Council Scheduled CIAC Meetings/Deadlines: 1.August 11th : LUA and IFCIPs 2.August 11th: Impact Fee Calculations, Benchmarking and Recommendations 3.August 18th : CIAC Recommendation Letter to Town Council on Impact Fee Rates ROLE AS CIAC MEMBER 4 Page 10 of 40 COST PER SERVICE UNIT CALCULATION 5 Impact Fee Eligible Cost = Portion of total project cost attributed to 10- year projected growth Credit = State law allows for a 50% credit Growth in SFLUE = 10-year growth in SFLUE Single Family Living Unit Equivalent (SFLUE) = Base unit represents a single-family home usage or discharge Impact Fee Eligible Cost Credit Growth In SFLUE Maximum Allowable Impact Fee -= TAC – Section 395.015.(a) TAC – Section 395.050 Page 11 of 40 Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation 6 Page 12 of 40 Water CIP •Secondary Water Supply Connection •New 4 MGD Pump Station in the East Pressure Plane •1.0 MG EST in the East Pressure Plane •0.5 MG EST in the West Pressure Plane •Transmission Mains 7 Page 13 of 40 Water CIP Projects 8 Proj. No.Description of Project Percent Utilization Capital Cost Current Development 10-Year 2025- 2035 Beyond 2035202512035 10-Year 2023-2033 PROPOSED 1 Water Supply Connection Improvements at the Davis Blvd Pump Station from Fort Worth 0%100%100%$1,151,300 $0 $1,151,300 $0 2 4.0 MGD Firm Capacity at the Davis Boulevard Pump Station (East PP) and 1.5 MG Ground Storage Tank 53%84%31%$11,855,400 $6,283,362 $3,675,174 $1,896,864 3 20-inch Dove Road Water Line Extension 0%30%30%$2,253,500 $0 $676,050 $1,577,450 4 16/20-inch US 377 Water Line Loop 0%37%37%$3,737,800 $0 $1,382,986 $2,354,814 5 2.0 MGD Water Supply Increase at the Davis Blvd Pump Station from Fort Worth (4.0 MGD Total)0%29%29%$500,000 $0 $145,000 $355,000 6 2.0 MGD Firm Capacity at the Davis Boulevard Pump Station (West PP)10%66%56%$2,980,800 $298,080 $1,669,248 $1,013,472 7 12-inch SH 114 Water Line Loop 0%42%42%$1,942,500 $0 $815,850 $1,126,650 8 1.0 MG Circle T Ranch Elevated Storage Tank 42%68%26%$6,809,200 $2,859,864 $1,770,392 $2,178,944 9 16-inch J.T. Ottinger Road Water Line 0%49%49%$1,529,800 $0 $749,602 $780,198 10 12-inch J.T. Ottinger Road Water Line 0%90%90%$674,000 $0 $606,600 $67,400 11 0.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank 25%62%37%$6,408,500 $1,602,125 $2,371,145 $2,435,230 12 12-inch US 377 Water Line Loop 0%32%32%$1,051,700 $0 $336,544 $715,156 13 12-inch Parish Lane Water Line Loop 0%54%54%$977,300 $0 $527,742 $449,558 14 12-inch Main Street Water Line Loop 0%82%82%$572,900 $0 $469,778 $103,122 Proposed Project Subtotal $42,444,700 $11,043,431 $16,347,411 $15,053,858 Future Water Impact Fee Study Update $45,000 $0 Finance/Interest Costs for Proposed Projects2 $6,803,402 -- Total Impact Fee Eligible Water Capital Improvement Cost $23,150,813 -- 1Utilization in 2025 on proposed projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth. 2Finance costs are based on the interest paid over an entire 20-year bond, to be collected within the 10-year Impact Fee period at a 4.0% interest rate. Page 14 of 40 Wastewater CIP •Gravity Mains •TRA Denton Creek WRF Expansion Cost Participation 9 Page 15 of 40 10 Proj. No.Description of Project Percent Utilization Capital Cost Current Development 10-Year 2025- 2035 Beyond 2035202512035 10-Year 2025-2035 PROPOSED 1 12-inch Parish Lane Gravity Main 0%100%100%$1,043,700 $0 $1,043,700 $0 2 8-inch Marshall Branch Gravity Main Extension 1 0%100%100%$1,042,100 $0 $1,042,100 $0 3 8-inch Marshall Branch Gravity Main Extension 2 0%100%100%$1,323,800 $0 $1,323,800 $0 4 8-inch Marshall Branch Gravity Main Extension 3 0%5%5%$1,007,800 $0 $50,390 $957,410 5 8-inch J.T. Ottinger Rd Gravity Main 14%15%1%$801,900 $112,266 $8,019 $681,615 6 10-inch Schwab Way Gravity Main 0%16%16%$540,600 $0 $86,496 $454,104 7 12-inch Turner Lake Replacement and Gravity Main Extension 6%7%1%$2,278,500 $136,710 $22,785 $2,119,005 8 TRA Denton Creek WRF Expansion Cost Participation3 0%5%5%$98,619,250 $0 $4,930,963 $4,580,316 Proposed Project Subtotal $106,657,650 $248,976 $8,508,253 $8,792,450 Future Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update $45,000 $0 Finance/Interest Costs for Proposed Projects2 $3,549,888 -- Total Impact Fee Eligible Wastewater Capital Improvement Cost $12,103,140 -- 1Utilization in 2025 on proposed projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth. 2Finance costs are based on the interest paid over an entire 20-year bond, to be collected within the 10-year Impact Fee period at a 4.0% interest rate. 3Beyond 2035 cost determined by utilization for buildout wastewater projections Wastewater CIP Projects Page 16 of 40 Water/Wastewater: Service Unit Equivalency (SUE) 11 Meter Size Maximum Flow Rate (gpm) Service Unit Equivalent (SUE) 3/4''30 1.00 1"50 1.67 1.5"100 3.33 2"160 5.33 3"350 11.67 4"600 20.00 6"1,400 46.67 Page 17 of 40 Projected Water/Wastewater SUEs 12 Meter Size Existing Meters Existing SUEs 2035 Meters 2035 SUEs 10-Year Growth in SUEs 3/4"188 188 326 326 138 1"626 1,045 1,076 1,796 751 1-1/2"141 469 243 809 340 2"109 580 209 1,113 533 3"9 105 18 210 105 4"10 200 20 400 200 6"2 93 4 186 93 Total 1,085 2,680 1,896 4,840 2,160 Meter Size (1) Existing Meters Existing SUEs 2035 Meters 2035 SUEs 10-Year Growth in SUEs 3/4"188 188 326 326 138 1"535 893 985 1,644 751 1-1/2"141 469 243 809 340 2"109 580 209 1,113 533 3"9 105 18 210 105 4"10 200 20 400 200 6"2 93 4 186 93 Total 994 2,528 1,805 4,688 2,160 (1) Septic users assumed to be on a 1" water meter Projected Water Service Units Projected Wastewater Service Units Page 18 of 40 Water/Wastewater: Cost Per Service Unit Calculation (3/4 -inch meter) 13 Water Impact Fee Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $16,392,411 Total Eligible Financing Costs $6,803,402 Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $23,150,813 Growth in Service Units 2,160 Water Impact Fee per Service Unit (1)$10,718 Impact Fee Credit per Service Unit(2)$5,359 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee (3)$5,359 (1) Total Eligible Costs divided by the Growth in Service Units. (2) Credit is 50% of Maximum Water Impact Fee per Service Unit. (3) Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee is Maximum Water Impact Fee minus the Impact Fee Credit per Service Unit. Wastewater Impact Fee Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $8,553,253 Total Eligible Financing Costs $3,549,888 Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $12,103,140 Growth in Service Units 2,160 Wastewater Impact Fee per Service Unit (1)$5,603 Impact Fee Credit per Service Unit (2)$2,801 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee (3)$2,801 (1) Total Eligible Costs divided by the Growth in Service Units. (2) Credit is 50% of Maximum Water Impact Fee per Service Unit. (3) Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee is Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee minus the Impact Fee Credit per Service Unit. Page 19 of 40 Water/Wastewater: Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rates 14 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalent Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee Combined Total 3/4"1 $5,359 $2,801 $8,160 1"1.67 $8,949 $4,677 $13,626 1 1/2"3.33 $17,845 $9,327 $27,172 2"5.33 $28,563 $14,929 $43,492 3"11.67 $62,539 $32,687 $95,226 4"20 $107,180 $56,020 $163,200 6"46.67 $250,104 $130,722 $380,826 Page 20 of 40 Roadway Impact Fee Calculation 15 Page 21 of 40 Roadway CIP 16 •21 New Projects •4 Recoupment Projects (already built) •Net Capacity Provided: 21,722 vehicle miles •Capacity necessitated by Growth (new demand): 52,836 vehicle miles Page 22 of 40 Roadway CIP Projects 17 Proj. No.Roadway To From Length (mi)Added Lanes Type % in Serv. Area Project Cost PROPOSED 1 SH 170 Roanoke Rd 0.45 4 DA 100%$4,349,400 2 Roanoke Rd Liberty Ext 0.41 4 DA 100%$3,965,700 3 Liberty Ext Ottinger Rd 0.61 4 DA 100%$5,894,000 4 US 377 Roanoke Rd 0.82 4 DA 100%$7,922,800 5 Roanoke Rd New Road A 0.74 4 DA 100%$7,151,500 6 New Road A New Road B 0.57 4 DA 100%$5,510,500 7 SH 170 Liberty Ext 0.11 4 DA 100%$996,900 8 Liberty Ext Ottinger Rd 0.37 4 DA 100%$3,576,900 9 New Road B New Road A 0.85 2 DA 100%$4,254,500 10 New Road A N Pearson Ln 0.73 2 DA 100%$3,594,600 11 Liberty Ext New Road A 0.54 4 DA 100%$5,224,200 12 Dove Rd Town Limits 0.27 2 DA 50%$697,800 13 Liberty Ext Town Limits 0.1 2 DA 100%$634,100 14 New Road E Ottinger Rd 0.4 4 DA 100%$3,863,800 15 N Pearson Ln Blue Sky Dr 0.59 2 DA 100%$2,852,400 16 New Road A Liberty Ext 0.52 2 DA 100%$3,229,900 17 Capital Way New Road E 0.61 2 DA 100%$5,894,000 18 SH 114 Westlake Pkwy 0.49 4 DA 100%$4,742,900 19 Westlake Pkwy Davis Blvd 0.85 2 DA 100%$5,237,300 20 Ottinger Rd New Road B 0.2 4 DA 100%$1,810,300 21 Dove Rd 50' S of Spring Dr 0.7 2 DA 100%$3,449,300 Proposed Project Subotal $84,852,800 $75,000 Finance/Interest Costs for Proposed Projects $15,739,333 $100,667,1331Utilization in 2025 on proposed projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system, and therefore are Finance costs are based on the interest paid over an entire 20-year bond, to be collected within the 10-year Impact Fee period at a 4.0% interest rate. Page 23 of 40 18 Roadway Impact Fee Service Area 1 Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $100,667,133 Percent Attributable to Growth 100% Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $100,667,133 Growth in Service Units 48,665 Roadway Impact Fee per Service Unit (1)$2,068 Impact Fee Credit per Service Unit (2)$1,034 Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee (3)$1,034 (1) Total Eligible Costs divided by the Growth in Service Units. (2) Credit is 50% of Maximum Roadway Impact Fee per Service Unit. (3) Maximum Allowable Roadway Impact Fee is Maximum Roadway Impact Fee less the Impact Fee Credit per Service Unit. Roadways: Cost Per Service Unit Calculation Page 24 of 40 Roadway Service Unit Equivalency Table 19 Page 25 of 40 Roadway Impact Fee Per Development Unit: Typical Land Uses 20 ITE Land Use ITE Code Development Unit Size Service Unit Equivalency Fee Single-family detached housing 210 Dwelling Units 1 unit 3.70 $3,825.80 Mixed Use*230 Dwelling Units 25 units 1.99 $17,061.00 Quality Restaurant 931 1,000 Sq Ft GFA 5,000 sq ft 2.96 $76,516.00 Retail/Shopping Center 820 1,000 Sq Ft GFA 25,000 sq ft 1.96 $50,666.00 Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 Sq Ft GFA 100,000 sq ft 5.49 $567,666.00 *Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise, 1-3 floors) w/ Ground Floor Commercial Page 26 of 40 Impact Fee Calculation 21 ROADWAYS - A Two Step Process: Step 1: Determine number of service units (vehicle-miles) generated by the development using the equivalency table. No. of Development x Vehicle-miles = Development's Units per development unit Vehicle-miles Step 2: Calculate the impact fee based on the fee per service unit for the roadway service area where the development is located. Development's x Cost per = Impact Fee due Vehicle-miles Vehicle-mile from Developer WATER/WASTEWATER: Determine the service unit equivalency based on the development’s meter connection size. Calculate the impact fee based on the fee per service unit. Service Unit x Cost per = Impact Fee due Equivalency Service Unit from Developer Page 27 of 40 Impact Fee Calculation: Single Family Dwelling Unit 22 Example: A new single-family development with the collection rates of Roadway at $3,825.00 per vehicle- mile; Water at $5,359.00 per service unit; and Wastewater at $2,801.00 per service unit. Single-Family Dwelling Roads: 1 dwelling unit x 3.70 veh-miles/dwelling unit = 3.70 veh-miles 3.70 veh-miles x $1,034/veh-mile = $3,825.80 Water (3/4” Meter): 1.00 service units x $5,359/service unit = $5,359.00 Wastewater (3/4” Meter): 1.00 service units x $2,801/service unit = $2,801.00 Total Impact Fee: Roads + Water + Wastewater = $11,985.80 Page 28 of 40 Benchmarking Charts 23 Page 29 of 40 24 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 Prosper* (2025) Colleyville (2022) Flower Mound (2021) Northlake (2022) Keller (2022) Westlake Fort Worth (2022/2025) Justin (2025) Haslet (2021) Southlake* (2018) Roanoke (2024) Roadway Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Fort Worth Impact Fee Water Impact Fee DRAFT Figure 1) Westlake $16,222 $26,911 $21,377 $20,766 $29,793 $14,389 $11,131 $13,293 $10,692 $6,565 $19,984 210: Single-family detached housing 42.5% 42.5% 50% 50% 80%94% 40%80% 39% XX% - Percent of Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rate (Those without a % charge 100% of the Maximum Allowable) *Based on a 1-inch meter 45% 75%47% 51% Fee Benchmarking: Single Family (3/4 -inch Meter) Page 30 of 40 25 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 Northlake (2022) Colleyville (2022) Prosper (2025) Keller (2022)Flower Mound (2021) Westlake Fort Worth (2022/2025) Justin (2025) Haslet (2021) Roanoke (2024) Southlake (2018) Roadway Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Fort Worth Impact Fee Water Impact Fee *Based on a 1-inch meter Westlake $24,512 $31,243 $29,793 $29,785 $48,954 $19,893 $18,551$19,673 $11,019 $10,692 $27,408 210: Single-family detached housing 50% 50%42.5%80% 80% 40% 94% 39% 47% 51% 75% 45% 42.5% XX% - Percent of Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rate (Those without a % charge 100% of the Maximum Allowable) Fee Benchmarking: Single Family (1 -inch Meter) Page 31 of 40 26 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 Flower Mound (2021) Northlake* (2022) Justin** (2025) Prosper (2025) Fort Worth* (2022/2025) Colleyville (2022) Westlake Keller (2022) Southlake (2018) Haslet (2021) Roanoke (2024) Roadway Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Fort Worth Impact Fee Water Impact Fee DRAFT Figure 2 Town of Westlake 25 Unit Mixed Use Benchmarking (2-inch meter) Westlake $270,646 $157,090 $133,271 $131,297 $127,178 $109,924 $102,533 $71,844 $62,522 $59,363 $38,197 230: Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise, 1-3 floors) * Used ITE code 220 as substitute for 231 - study / ordinance did not have values for 231 or 230 **ITE Codes not listed, used Multifamily value as default 47% 51% 42.5% 42.5% 45% 80% 80% 50% 50%75% 40%39% 94% XX% - Percent of Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rate (Those without a % charge 100% of the Maximum Allowable) Fee Benchmarking: 25 Unit Mixed Use (2 -inch Meter) Page 32 of 40 27 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000 $200,000 Flower Mound (2021) Northlake (2022) Colleyville (2022) Fort Worth (2022) Prosper* (2025) Keller (2022) Westlake Southlake* (2018) Justin (2025) Haslet (2021) Roanoke (2024) Roadway Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Fort Worth Impact Fee Water Impact Fee $186,763 DRAFT Figure 3 Town of Westlake 5,000 sq ft Quality Restaurant Benchmarking (1 1/2-inch meter) Westlake $55,503 $65,067 $118,933 $110,076 $83,053 $66,355 $54,335 $37,102 $37,018 *Based on a 2-inch meter $152,166 931: Quality Restaurant 50% 50%39% 94% 40% 80% 80%42.5% 42.5% 75% 25% 75% 42%51% 47% XX% - Percent of Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rate (Those without a % charge 100% of the Maximum Allowable) Fee Benchmarking: 5,000 sq ft Quality Restaurant (1 1/2-inch Meter) Page 33 of 40 28 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Northlake (2022) Flower Mound (2021) Colleyville (2022) Keller (2022) Prosper* (2025) Fort Worth (2022/2025) Southlake* (2018) Westlake Justin (2025) Haslet (2021) Roanoke (2024) Roadway Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Fort Worth Impact Fee Water Impact Fee $559,175 DRAFT Figure 3 Town of Westlake 25,000 sq ft Shopping Center Benchmarking (1 1/2-inch meter) Westlake $100,430 $287,055 $322,123 $288,525 $236,050 $109,673 $88,355 $37,102 $37,018 *Based on a 2-inch meter $477,606 820: Retail/Shopping Center 80%80% 94% 42.5%50%50%39%40%42.5% 75% 45%75% 63% 47% XX% - Percent of Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rate (Those without a % charge 100% of the Maximum Allowable) Fee Benchmarking: 25,000 sq ft Shopping Center (1 1/2-inch Meter) Page 34 of 40 29 $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 Northlake* (2022) Prosper (2025) Fort Worth (2022/2025) Flower Mound (2021) Keller (2022) Westlake Colleyville (2022) Justin (2025) Southlake (2018) Haslet (2021) Roanoke (2024) Roadway Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Fort Worth Impact Fee Water Impact Fee $1,410,450 DRAFT Figure 4 Town of Westlake 100,000 sq ft Corporate Campus Benchmarking (4-inch meter) Westlake $1,307,255 $1,008,860 $788,718$836,856 $358,789 $2,359,017* $243,882 $171,207 *Fee based on a commercial land use equivalency 714: Corporate Headerquarters Building $370,080 $1,363,883 40% 80% 80% 42.5% 94% 39%50% 50%42.5% 75% 44% 75% 45% 45% XX% - Percent of Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Rate (Those without a % charge 100% of the Maximum Allowable) Fee Benchmarking: 100,000 sq ft Corporate Campus (4 -inch Meter) Page 35 of 40 CIAC Next Steps and Action Items 30 Page 36 of 40 CIAC Action Today Next Steps •August 11, 2025 •CIAC Meeting #3: Discuss impact fee calculations, benchmarking, and recommendations •August 18, 2025 •Provide a written recommendation to Town Council on water, wastewater, and roadway impact fee rates •August 25, 2025 •Public hearing #2 to adopt impact fee rates CIAC = Capital Improvement Advisory Committee31Page 37 of 40 Action Items 32 •Consider/Approve Impact Fee rates (Today) •Water, Wastewater, and Roadway Fees •Written Recommendation to Town staff (Due by August 18, 2025) •To be provided to Town Council for Public Hearing Consideration Page 38 of 40 Thank You ! Andrew Franko | asf@freese.com Kristin Feng | kristin.feng@freese.com Eddie Haas | eh@freese.com Page 39 of 40 Additional Information 34 Page 40 of 40