HomeMy WebLinkAboutTowards a continuum of international eduacationTowards a continuum of international education
Primary Years Programme, Middle Years Programme and Diploma Programme
Primary Years Programme, Middle Years Programme and Diploma Programme
Towards a continuum of international education
GD186PrintedintheUnitedKingdombyAntonyRoweLtd, Chippenham, Wiltshire
Published September 2008
International Baccalaureate
Peterson House, Malthouse Avenue, Cardiff Gate
Cardiff, Wales GB CF23 8GL
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 29 2054 7777
Fax: +44 29 2054 7778
Website: http://www.ibo.org
International Baccalaureate Organization 2008
The International Baccalaureate (IB) offers three high quality and challenging
educational programmes for a worldwide community of schools, aiming to create
a better, more peaceful world.
The IB is grateful for permission to reproduce and/or translate any copyright
material used in this publication. Acknowledgments are included, where
appropriate, and, if notified, the IB will be pleased to rectify any errors or omissions
at the earliest opportunity.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior
written permission of the IB, or as expressly permitted by law or by the IB’s own
rules and policy. See http://www.ibo.org/copyright.
IB merchandise and publications can be purchased through the IB store at
http://store.ibo.org. General ordering queries should be directed to the sales and
marketing department in Cardiff.
Phone: +44 29 2054 7746
Fax: +44 29 2054 7779
Email: sales@ibo.org
Primary Years Programme, Middle Years Programme
and Diploma Programme
Towards a continuum of international education
Towards a continuum of international education
Contents
Introduction 1
The three IB programmes 2
The philosophy of the continuum of international education 2
Implementing the continuum 6
Programme structures 8
The Primary Years Programme (PYP) 9
The Middle Years Programme (MYP) 9
The Diploma Programme (DP) 10
Teaching and learning 12
Introduction 12
The purpose of teaching and learning: Teaching for understanding 13
Approaches to teaching and learning 14
The learning environment: Active learning in a supportive school culture 16
Summary 17
Assessment 18
The principles of IB assessment 18
Developing an assessment policy 20
Leading the development of the continuum: Pedagogical leadership 22
What constitutes effective, sustainable leadership? 22
The pedagogical leadership team 22
Supporting ongoing professional development 24
The language continuum 25
Learning in a language other than a mother tongue in IB programmes 25
Developing a school language policy 26
Special educational needs 28
Introduction 28
Special educational needs in IB programmes 28
Contents
Towards a continuum of international education
Action, community and service, and CAS 33
Action in the PYP 33
Community and service in the MYP 34
Creativity, action, service in the DP 35
The culminating experience 37
The PYP exhibition 37
The MYP personal project 37
The DP extended essay 38
Opportunities for celebration 38
Programme evaluation 39
The self-study (PYP, MYP and DP) 39
The school visit (PYP and MYP) 39
The evaluation report (PYP, MYP and DP) 40
Bibliography 41
Towards a continuum of international education 1
This document has been produced by the International Baccalaureate (IB). It is intended for:
candidateschoolst
IB World Schools that are newly authorized to offer one of the three IBprogrammest
experienced IB World Schools that are implementing or planning to implement more than one IBt
programme.
It summarizes the common elements and the differences between the Primary Years Programme (PYP), the
Middle Years Programme (MYP) and the Diploma Programme (DP) and provides some practical guidance as
to how schools can implement the IB continuum of international education effectively in order to develop a
coherent, meaningful educational pathway for students.
This document should be read in conjunction with the following IB documents.
PYP Making the PYP happen: A curriculum framework for international primary education
Making the PYP happen: Pedagogical leadership in a PYP school
MYP MYP: From principles into practice
Interdisciplinary teaching: A guide for schools (available from 2009)
DP Theory of knowledge guide
Creativity, action, service guide
Extended essay guide
Diploma Programme assessment: Principles and practice
Handbook of procedures for the Diploma Programme
Candidates with special assessment needs
General IB learner profile booklet
Programme standards and practices
Learning in a language other than mother tongue in IB programmes
Guidelines for developing a school language policy
Guide to programme evaluation
Introduction
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation2
The three IB programmes
The International Baccalaureate (IB) offers three programmes of international education:
the Diploma Programme (DP)—introduced in1969t
the Middle Years Programme (MYP)—introduced in1994t
the Primary Years Programme (PYP)—introduced in 1997.t
These programmes provide the opportunity for schools to offer a continuous international educational
experience from early childhood through to school graduation.
While the IB now offers a sequence of three programmes, two fundamental principles need to be
supported.
Each programme should be self-contained, since there is no requirement for schools to offer moret
than one programme.
Programmes should form a coherent and meaningful sequence where schools offer all threet
programmes or any sequence of two.
Teachers, students and parents will recognize a common educational framework—a consistent philosophy
about teaching and learning that focuses on the development of the whole child, and an overarching
concept of how to develop international-mindedness.
Each programme promotes the education of the whole person, emphasizing intellectual, personal, emotional
and social growth, involving the traditions of learning in languages, humanities, sciences, mathematics and
the arts. While the three programmes have grown from a western humanist tradition, the influence of non-
western cultures on all three programmes is becoming increasingly important.
The links between the three programmes, which offer a continuum of international education, become
a reality when the programmes are implemented by dedicated administrators and teachers in IB World
Schools. While the programmes have common elements, the effectiveness of the implementation of a
sequence of two or three programmes depends ultimately on a commitment by the school to building
a continuum and maintaining a clear focus on teaching and learning. This requires continuous, mutual
cooperation and collaboration between administrators and teachers at all levels.
What is it then that ensures the consistency and the broad base of the three programmes? What opportunities
and insights does the sequence provide for developing a template for international education, spanning the
formal years of schooling?
The philosophy of the continuum of international
education
The driving force behind the PYP, MYP and the DP is a deeply held philosophy about the nature of
international education expressed in the mission statement of the IB and in the IB learner profile.
The mission statement expresses the IB’s overall purpose in promoting and developing programmes of
international education.
The three IB programmes
Towards a continuum of international education 3
The IB mission statement
The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable
and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world
through intercultural understanding and respect.
To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international
organizations to develop challenging programmes of international education
and rigorous assessment.
These programmes encourage students across the world to become active,
compassionate and lifelong learners who understand that other people, with
their differences, can also be right.
In IB programmes, the attempt to define international-mindedness in increasingly clear terms, and the
struggle to move closer to that ideal in practice, are central to the mission of IB World Schools. Given the
variety of IB World Schools, and the complexity of the concept of international-mindedness, the IB has
focused on the kind of student we hope will graduate from an IB World School, the kind of student who, in
the struggle to establish a personal set of values and a code of ethics, will be laying the foundation upon
which international-mindedness will develop and flourish. The attributes of such a learner are listed in the
IB learner profile. The IB learner profile is the mission statement in action; it is central to the IB definition of
what it means to be internationally minded, and it directs schools to focus on learning. IB World Schools
should be proud to send out into the world students who exemplify the attributes expressed in this profile.
The IB learner profile is based on values that are the embodiment of what the organization believes about
international education. The attributes described in the learner profile are appropriate to and achievable
by all IB students from the ages of 3 to 19. The teacher needs to interpret these attributes in a manner
appropriate to the age and development of the student, always bearing in mind that part of the adaptability
and versatility of IB programmes lies in what these attributes may look like from one school culture to
another.
In IB programmes it is both recognized and appreciated that students come from various backgrounds
and bring with them a wealth of experience. All teachers have a responsibility to help students develop as
lifelong learners in the context of the learner profile.
The mission statement and the learner profile are at the heart of the IB programme continuum.
The three IB programmes
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation4
The IB learner profile
The aim of all IB programmes is to develop internationally minded people who, recognizing their
common humanity and shared guardianship of the planet, help to create a better and more peaceful
world.
IB learners strive to be:
Inquirers They develop their natural curiosity. They acquire the skills necessary to
conduct inquiry and research and show independence in learning. They
actively enjoy learning and this love of learning will be sustained throughout
their lives.
Knowledgeable They explore concepts, ideas and issues that have local and global significance.
In so doing, they acquire in-depth knowledge and develop understanding
across a broad and balanced range of disciplines.
Thinkers They exercise initiative in applying thinking skills critically and creatively to
recognize and approach complex problems, and make reasoned, ethical
decisions.
Communicators They understand and express ideas and information confidently and creatively
in more than one language and in a variety of modes of communication. They
work effectively and willingly in collaboration with others.
Principled They act with integrity and honesty, with a strong sense of fairness, justice and
respect for the dignity of the individual, groups and communities. They take
responsibility for their own actions and the consequences that accompany
them.
Open-minded They understand and appreciate their own cultures and personal histories, and
are open to the perspectives, values and traditions of other individuals and
communities. They are accustomed to seeking and evaluating a range of points
of view, and are willing to grow from the experience.
Caring They show empathy, compassion and respect towards the needs and feelings
of others. They have a personal commitment to service, and act to make a
positive difference to the lives of others and to the environment.
Risk-takers They approach unfamiliar situations and uncertainty with courage and
forethought, and have the independence of spirit to explore new roles, ideas
and strategies. They are brave and articulate in defending their beliefs.
Balanced They understand the importance of intellectual, physical and emotional
balance to achieve personal well-being for themselves and others.
Reflective They give thoughtful consideration to their own learning and experience. They
are able to assess and understand their strengths and limitations in order to
support their learning and personal development.
In addition to the IB mission statement and IB learner profile, schools implementing the continuum must
refer closely to the IB document Programme standards and practices, This document provides a set of criteria
against which both the IB World School and the IB Organization can measure success in the implementation
of the PYP, MYP and DP.
The school must make a commitment to work towards meeting all the standards and practices in the
document. These form the basis of a self-study, which schools undertake as part of the programme
evaluation process (see “Programme evaluation”). For each school, the implementation of an IB programme
and the IB continuum of international education is a journey; the IB recognizes that the school will meet
these standards and practices to varying degrees along the way.
The three IB programmes
Towards a continuum of international education 5
PYP MYP DP
Nature Framework Framework Prescribed curriculum
Inclusive Inclusive Aimed at preparing
students for higher
education
Structure Transdisciplinary units
of inquiry
Organized around
disciplines with
interdisciplinary areas
of interaction
Organized around
disciplines with
theory of knowledge
connecting the
disciplines
How the
programme is
assessed
Internal assessment
of all aspects of a
student’s learning
Internal assessment
based on subject-
specific criteria;
schools can opt for
external moderation
of teachers’ internal
assessment
External moderation
of internally assessed
work and external
examinations
Learning to learn Transdisciplinary
concepts and skills
Approaches to
learning
Theory of knowledge
Learning through
experience
Action Community and
service
Creativity, action,
service
Language learning Support for mother-
tongue development
Support for mother-
tongue/best language
development
Support for mother-
tongue development:
school supported,
self-taught language
A1 courses
School’s additional
language from age 7
Student’s additional
language (language B)
Student’s additional
language (language B)
Culminating
experience that
synthesizes
learning
Exhibition Personal project Extended essay
IB LEARNER PROFILE
IB MISSION STATEMENT
Figure 1:
The IB continuum of international education
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation6
Implementing the continuum
The strength of the IB programmes is that they all grew from common beliefs about the importance
and nature of international education, and out of the work of practising teachers and administrators in
schools. The IB has not changed the original concept of the programmes in any way, although all three have
developed significantly since their inception, and will continue to do so. The continuum, like the growth
of a student, is not a smooth trajectory—moving from one programme to the next may necessitate a few
leaps—but there is a level of coherence that gives it a recognizable identity and great value. Implementing
two or three IB programmes requires teachers and school administrators to work together on the basis of a
common philosophy, using the same language to talk about teaching and learning and the development of
students. This, in turn, means that the experience of the student will be more coherent and meaningful, and
learning will be significantly enriched.
The PYP and MYP are curriculum frameworks, whereas the DP is a prescribed curriculum. There are important
reasons for this difference. Each programme is designed to meet the developmental needs of students
of particular ages and at key stages of identity formation. Schools need room to shape the curriculum
according to local requirements and to their cultural realities and priorities. The DP has to provide students
with the qualifications to gain entry to universities anywhere in the world, hence the increased level of
prescription in the programme.
The PYP and MYP are coherent and comprehensive programmes that allow schools, through collaborative
teams of teachers, to develop their own content—content that is relevant to the cultural context of the
school. The framework offers some degree of flexibility, allowing schools to incorporate local or national
curriculum requirements if necessary. Student learning is assessed internally by teachers and, in the MYP,
teachers’ assessment can be externally moderated by the IB in order to meet recognized global standards.
The DP is, equally, a coherent and comprehensive programme but the curriculum and assessment procedures
are prescribed in more detail in order to meet the requirements for university entrance around the world.
Student learning in the DP is assessed largely by external examinations set by the IB.
The PYP and MYP are inclusive programmes with the flexibility to meet the needs of all students. The DP
is not exclusive but, because it is aimed at providing students with all they need to be successful in higher
education, the full IB Diploma Programme may not be the best fit for all students.
The PYP and MYP use different structures and approaches from the DP in order to meet the intellectual and
developmental needs of students in the relevant age groups, but they prepare students both intellectually
and personally to be successful in the DP. While there is a common, strong philosophy underpinning the
three programmes, each programme has distinct characteristics that are appropriate to the age level for
which it was designed. For a school wanting to implement two or more of the programmes, the challenge
is to recognize and value the differences while working to help teachers and students bridge the transition
points. A comparison can be made with the development of the students themselves. There are enormous
differences between a 7 year old, a 13 year old and an 18 year old, intellectually, emotionally and socially,
as well as physically. They do not want to be treated in the same way, nor would the same response be
effective, but they need the help of their parents and teachers to make the transition from one phase of
their lives to the next. Sometimes that transition is a gradual progression; sometimes it requires the student
to make a leap.
As the number of two- and three-programme schools grows and we learn from the experience of school
leaders and teachers in those schools, so the programmes will slowly be influenced by each other. They will
adapt and change because it makes educational sense to do so and because the adaptation will enhance
student learning and the quality of teaching.
Implementing the continuum
Towards a continuum of international education 7
Implementing the IB continuum of international education means bringing about institutional change in
order to improve teaching and learning and to strengthen the school community and culture. An IB World
School that implements the continuum is committed to reflection, improving practice and to long-term
sustained change. It is expected that such schools will be outward looking, as well as forward thinking, and
will be making connections within the family of IB World Schools and making contributions both to the IB
community and to their local community.
One of the great advantages that the IB programmes have recognized and benefited from since their
inception has been the “creative professionalism” (Hargreaves 1998) of teachers and their willingness to
experiment with ideas and practices. The PYP and MYP are deliberately constructed to allow teachers the
freedom to innovate and contextualize learning in their schools. IB programmes are based on a high level of
trust in teacher professionalism. Innovative and committed teachers of IB programmes from many different
cultures have also played a very significant role in the development of each programme. Continuing to find
new ways to support schools and teachers around the world, drawing on the rich variety of their educational
traditions and harnessing their professional knowledge, is the highest priority for the IB. The role of school
practitioners ensures that the links between the three programmes benefit from the extensive practical,
diverse and current experience that only they are able to provide. Such a role is pivotal in the IB’s model
for the development and implementation of each programme and for the continuum of international
education; it is based on a critical relationship between the programmes, the teachers and the schools
Walker 2000).
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation8
Programme structures
While there are significant differences in the structures of the PYP, MYP and DP, there are also key principles
that connect them.
In all three programmes, the student is at the centre of the curriculum, as expressed through the IBt
learner profile.
While each academic discipline has its own methodology, body of knowledge and nuances, studentst
learn better when meaningful connections are made between the disciplines.
There is a gradual transition from the transdisciplinary approach of the PYP to specifically identified
disciplines in the MYP and DP, supported by approaches that foster connections.
PYP MYP DP
Programme of inquiry,
including scope and sequence
documents for six subject areas
Eight subject areas with aims
and objectives and assessment
criteria
Six groups of subjects with
detailed syllabus and assessment
guides
Teaching through six
transdisciplinary themes
Teaching through eight subject
areas connected through five
areas of interaction
Teaching through six subject
groups connected by theory of
knowledge
Units of inquiry within each
transdisciplinary theme,
incorporating the learning of
language, mathematics, social
studies, science, the arts and
personal, social and physical
education
Units of work in each subject
area, with some interdisciplinary
units of work, focused on the
areas of interaction
Course outlines for each subject
including theory of knowledge,
extended essay and creativity,
action, service
Language A
Language B
Humanities
Sciences
Mathematics
Arts
Physical education
Technology
Language A1
Second language
Individuals and societies
Experimental sciences
Mathematics and computer
science
The arts
Prescribed planner to support
inquiry
Recommended planner for units
of work
Figure 2:
Programme structures
Programme structures
Towards a continuum of international education 9
The Primary Years Programme (PYP)
In the PYP the importance of the traditional subject areas is acknowledged: language, mathematics, social
studies, science, the arts and personal, social and physical education are specified as components of the PYP
curriculum model. Overall expectations for each subject, within each age range, are specified in detailed
scope and sequence documents, which are available to schools as exemplar material.
It is particularly important for students in the primary years of education to acquire skills in context, and to
explore content that is relevant to them and that transcends the boundaries of the traditional subjects. The
PYP curriculum is centred on six transdisciplinary themes based around shared human commonalities
that are considered essential in the context of international education. These themes are supported by
knowledge, concepts and skills from the traditional subject areas but utilize them in ways that transcend
the confines of these subjects, thereby contributing to the transdisciplinary model of teaching and
learning.
PYP transdisciplinary themes Who we are
Where we are in place and time
How we express ourselves
How the world works
How we organize ourselves
Sharing the planet
Students inquire into, and learn about, these globally significant issues in the context of units of inquiry,
each of which addresses a central idea relevant to a particular transdisciplinary theme. These units
collectively constitute the school’s programme of inquiry. Teachers in IB World Schools that offer the PYP
work collaboratively to develop a transdisciplinary programme of inquiry designed to meet the school’s
needs. Schools explore the possibilities for links between the units taught at each year level, and also across
the different age ranges, so that the programme of inquiry is articulated both vertically and horizontally.
The Middle Years Programme (MYP)
The MYP curriculum has eight subject areas for which aims and objectives are prescribed. All students study
all of the subject areas throughout the five years of the programme. The eight subject areas are connected
through the five areas of interaction that transcend the boundaries of the traditional disciplines and are
focused on human commonalities, in a similar way to the transdisciplinary themes of the PYP.
The objectives of each of the MYP subjects are based on the development of a balance of knowledge, skills
and attitudes, broad enough to allow a variety of teaching and learning approaches. The precise choice and
organization of content is left to schools in order to preserve flexibility. Subject content is not specified,
although in some subjects a framework of concepts or topics is prescribed for all students to address over
the five years. Such prescription is kept to a minimum and schools are asked to expand their scope of topics
and depth of treatment according to individual needs and preferences.
It is each school’s responsibility to collaboratively produce units of work for each subject that will enable
students to reach the final objectives of each subject. Unit planning should begin with the integration of the
significant concepts to be taught with the context or area of interaction, giving rise to a unit question.
The areas of interaction give the MYP its distinctive core. The areas are common to all disciplines and are
incorporated into the MYP so that students will become increasingly aware of the connections between
Programme structures
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation10
subject content and the real world, rather than considering subjects as isolated areas unrelated to each
other and to the world. The five areas of interaction have no clear boundaries, but merge to form a context
for learning that contributes to the student’s experience of the curriculum.
MYP areas of interaction Approaches to learning
Community and service
Human ingenuity (previously homo faber)
Environments
Health and social education
Through the areas of interaction and the subject groups, the MYP presents knowledge as an integrated
whole, emphasizing the acquisition of skills and self-awareness, and the development of personal values. As
a result, students are expected to develop an awareness of broader, more complex global issues.
Interdisciplinary learning in the MYP is the process by which students come to understand bodies of
knowledge and modes of thinking from two or more disciplines or subject groups and integrate them to
create a new understanding. It is a central feature of the MYP curriculum and should be visible in teachers’
units of work, student work and assessment criteria.
Interdisciplinary learning seeks to promote interdisciplinary understanding. Students demonstrate
interdisciplinary understanding of a particular topic when they can bring together concepts, methods
or forms of communication from two or more disciplines or established areas of expertise to explain a
phenomenon, solve a problem, create a product or raise a new question in ways that would have been
unlikely through single disciplinary means.
As with the PYP, schools must plan collaboratively, both vertically and horizontally, through the five years of
the MYP to explore the links between the discipline-based and interdisciplinary units taught at each grade
level and across the grades.
The Diploma Programme (DP)
The DP is structured around the shape of a hexagon, with six subject groups or academic areas, surrounding
a core. Students select six subjects, one from each academic area, and also study or participate in the three
areas of the core.
DP core areas Extended essay
Theory of knowledge (TOK)
Creativity, action, service (CAS)
For each of the subjects in the hexagon the syllabus and assessment model are prescribed in great detail.
Teachers have some choice of options in most of the subjects but that choice is limited compared to the
flexibility available to schools and teachers in the PYP and MYP. The reason for this is that the DP is a pre-
university course of studies leading to examinations; it is designed as a comprehensive two-year curriculum
that allows its graduates to fulfill the requirements of various national education systems.
While providing students with the necessary skills and qualifications to enter a range of higher education
institutions around the world, the DP also makes provision for students to increase their awareness and
understanding of the connections between the academic disciplines they are engaged in every day and the
real world. A key aim of TOK is to encourage students to reflect on their experiences as learners in everyday
life and to make connections between academic disciplines and between thoughts, feelings and actions.
Programme structures
Towards a continuum of international education 11
TOK guiding questions are incorporated into every DP subject guide, and subject teachers are expected to
make connections with TOK issues through their daily teaching.
The DP offers two courses that combine academic disciplines: text and performance (groups 1 and 6,
currently in the pilot stage) and environmental systems and societies (groups 3 and 4). It is also piloting an
extended essay in world studies as an alternative to a topic chosen from the approved list of DP subjects.
The world studies extended essay will allow students to focus on a global issue while drawing knowledge
and methodology from more than one academic discipline. The IB will continue to explore ways of offering
DP students more opportunities to study in an interdisciplinary way in order to allow them to explore
multidisciplinary global issues and to enhance their learning in general.
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation12
Teaching and learning
The purpose of education is] to develop to their fullest potential the powers of
each individual to understand, to modify and to enjoy his or her environment,
both inner and outer, in its physical, social, moral, aesthetic and spiritual
aspects.
Alec Peterson (1987, p 33)
The responsibility of educators is no longer just to prepare good mathematicians,
good biologists or good historians. The mission of schools is to prepare young
people—the decision makers of tomorrow—to live in a complex multicultural
society undergoing a rapid process of change and opening up a new world
order. Of course, the cognitive component of an educational system is
fundamental for the acquisition of intellectual and professional skills. Even
more important is the acquisition of attitudes in the learning process in a
context of cultural exchanges.
Gérard Renaud, (1991, p 8)
Introduction
This section is a brief statement of the key principles of teaching and learning that underpin the three IB
programmes. The pedagogical approaches described here are based on a constructivist understanding of
how children learn. Constructivism is a theory of cognition, now widely used and accepted, that asserts that
knowledge is not passively learned but actively built and refers to approaches that recognize the importance
of engaging and challenging existing mental models in learners in order to improve understanding and
performance.
In the light of a constructivist understanding of teaching and learning, IB programmes are designed to
stimulate young people to be intellectually curious and equip them with the knowledge, conceptual
understanding, skills, reflective practices and attitudes needed to become autonomous lifelong learners.
The IB programme continuum recognizes that learning is a process not a product. Students of all ages come
to school with their own beliefs, knowledge and experience about how the world works. These mental
constructs are revisited and revised in the light of new experiences and learning. The process of learning
is, therefore, a developmental path of constructing, testing and revising mental models of how the world
works and it is this process that enables each student to make meaning of their lives and the world around
them. Furthermore, students must understand how they learn, their own preferred styles, strengths and
limitations, if they are to become autonomous lifelong learners. Above all learning for IB students should be
rigorous, engaging, challenging and should equip students for life in the 21st century.
In implementing IB programmes, teachers are expected to use a wide range of teaching strategies and to
teach in a way that supports student learning. PYP classrooms based on transdisciplinary units of inquiry will
look very different from DP classrooms centred on the academic disciplines. The principles and approaches
outlined here are, however, equally applicable to all three programmes.
Teaching and learning in IB programmes must be viewed in the context of the IB learner profile. The profile
lists 10 attributes of IB learners. Some of these—inquirers, knowledgeable, thinkers, communicators and
reflective—imply the development of cognitive competencies. The other attributes—principled, open-
minded, caring, balanced and risk-takers—emphasize dispositions and attitudes. Teaching and learning in
Teaching and learning
Towards a continuum of international education 13
all three programmes recognizes that cognitive skills and competencies are embedded in dispositions and
attitudes. Learning should occur in meaningful real-world contexts and the voice of the learner must be
emphasized. This requires that IB teachers model themselves on the learner profile, consider themselves
lifelong learners and be able and willing to support all their students on the journey to becoming
autonomous learners.
The purpose of teaching and learning: Teaching for
understanding
The central purpose of teaching and learning is to help students develop and extend the concepts they use
to understand the world, solve problems and communicate. Knowledge consists of bodies of information.
A new concept is developed when meaningful connections are made between bodies of knowledge and
other existing concepts, and the making of those connections leads to a deeper understanding of the world
and an improved ability to solve problems. Humans are by their nature makers of meaning. The challenge
of excellent teaching is to help students achieve genuine and sophisticated understanding that helps them
function effectively and independently in an increasingly complex world.
Central to teaching for understanding is the use of guiding or key questions. The act of framing these open
or generative questions causes teachers to focus on the reasons why they are teaching that particular body
of information and thus it helps them ensure that the knowledge and skills they are teaching are relevant
and meaningful. The use of questions in the PYP to frame the units of inquiry, in the MYP to focus learning
through the areas of interaction, and to structure learning in theory of knowledge and the academic
disciplines in the DP have all proved to be highly effective in developing conceptual understanding in
students of all ages. Enabling students to understand key concepts and develop conceptual thinking
requires that IB teachers keep their eyes firmly fixed on the big or central ideas and requires them to take
every opportunity to help students make those important connections.
Effective learning for life in the 21st century recognizes that:
the knowledge base is increasing rapidly, requiring learners to process and evaluate knowledge, nott
just acquire it
the world is changing rapidly, requiring learners to anticipate the unknown and adapt to change, nott
just respond to it
employment prospects increasingly require an ability to transfer skills andlearningt
learning to work and solve problems collaboratively is becoming as important as learning to workt
individually
how the brain learns is becoming better understood with implications for teaching and learning thatt
need to be respected
developing self-confidence in learners, as well as academic competence, is essential if learners aret
going to be able to function effectively; affective dispositions in addition to cognitive competence are
central to learning
constructive critical thinking is a tool necessary for individual and collective survival; students mustt
learn to be able to distinguish sense from nonsense, propaganda from truth and make their own well-
informed judgments.
Teaching and learning
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation14
Approaches to teaching and learning
For the sake of clarity the approaches to teaching and learning are described under three headings:
learning how tolearnt
structuredinquiryt
critical thinking.t
In reality these categories overlap and describe complementary approaches.
Learning how to learn
Learning how to learn requires that students realistically evaluate and self-regulate their performance.
Effective learners monitor what they are doing and produce effective responses because they are self-aware
and have a realistic appreciation of, and control over, their own learning process. They do not simply acquire
more skills and knowledge.
Metacognition is a term used to refer to the reflective thinking strategies, attitudes and other competencies
used to monitor and control learning. The concept can be further divided into two categories, but both are
required for effective practice:
metacognitive knowledge—knowledge learners have about themselves and how they learnbestt
metacognitive performance—the ability to use self-knowledge to improve performance.t
In an effective learning environment metacognitive knowledge and performance can be nurtured rather
than taught. At a young age all students cannot help but develop metacognitive understanding since
being human” is characterized by self-awareness and the need to learn and make decisions. One central
challenge of education is the development of a positive and realistic self-understanding that helps learners
to effectively make judgments and solve problems. Nurturing metacognitive knowledge and performance
means providing a learning environment and teaching practices that require students to constantly plan,
reflect, monitor and check their work and to self-evaluate.
Learners manage their thought processes in different ways. No two learners are identical. Students have
individual learning styles, preferred ways of using their abilities. Students’ learning styles can also vary from
one learning context to another. This makes it difficult to teach learning or study skills to students out of
context or to teach one method as appropriate for all. While students can be taught strategies that might
help them with metacognitive tasks they must learn to apply these themselves and be exposed to a number
of approaches. Teaching students how they learn best must be an integral part of the curriculum and not
considered as a separate task.
Teachers need to model to students the reflective practices they want students to develop, and they should
identify their own teaching and learning styles. Approaches to learning and assessment strategies need to
be varied to accommodate different styles of learning. Students must understand the aims of individual
learning tasks and what constitutes excellent performance. Formative assessment, providing clear feedback
to students on areas of relative strength and weakness, can help students better understand how to improve
their performance.
Structured inquiry
The IB learner profile states that IB learners strive to be “inquirers”, describing the process as developing
natural curiosity together with the skills needed to enable them to become autonomous lifelong learners.
Inquiry involves an active engagement with the social and physical environment in an effort to make sense
of the world, and consequent reflection on the connections between the experiences encountered and
Teaching and learning
Towards a continuum of international education 15
the information gathered. Inquiry involves synthesis, analysis and manipulation of knowledge. Structured
inquiry describes the strategies and supports that teachers use to facilitate student inquiry that is purposeful
and productive.
Depending on the context, students are expected to explore significant issues by formulating their own
questions or seeking the answers to prescribed ones. All three programmes expect students, in an age-
appropriate way, to be able to:
design their owninquiriest
assess the various means available to support theirinquiriest
proceed with research, experimentation, observation and analysis that will help them in finding theirt
own responses to the issues and in solving problems.
The starting point is students’ current understanding, and the goal the active construction of meaning by
building connections between that understanding and the new information and experience derived from
the inquiry into the new content.
Inquiry, interpreted in the broadest sense, is the process initiated by the student or the teacher that moves
the student from their current level of understanding to a new and deeper level of understanding. This
often involves many of the following activities:
speculating, exploring, questioningt
making connections between previous learning and currentlearningt
researchingt
developing and testingtheoriest
collecting data, reporting findings and constructingexplanationst
clarifying existing ideas and reappraising perceptions ofeventst
identifyingassumptionst
taking and defending apositiont
solving problems in a variety ofwayst
analysing andevaluatingt
considering alternative explanations.t
The approach to inquiry between the programmes shifts from a transdisciplinary model in the PYP to a more
disciplinary approach in the MYP and the DP. Students must be taught the skills, strategies and knowledge
needed to be effective inquirers, in developmentally age-appropriate ways, throughout the continuum.
Critical thinking
The IB learner profile states that IB students strive to become “thinkers” by applying thinking skills critically
and creatively to approach complex problems and make decisions. To think critically is to be curious, to
question, to connect, to search for alternative reasons or explanations, to challenge, to be able to stand back
and take an objective view. Students, therefore, must be taught the tools of critical thinking in appropriate
contexts, as well as how to apply them rigorously.
To think critically means students reflecting on, thinking about and analysing a text, argument or opinion so
that they do not just accept what is stated but form their own judgment. To think critically is to explore and
understand the reasons for beliefs and their implications. In our 21st century knowledge society we have
Teaching and learning
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation16
never had so much information, in such a variety of forms and from such a range of sources. It is, therefore,
essential that students learn how to think critically so as to be able to:
determine the validity and authenticity of what they read orheart
question the attitudes and history behind what they read orheart
develop the confidence and experience with which to form an opinion.t
It is also essential that IB students have the opportunity to engage with subject matter that is relevant,
provocative, challenging and significant and with which they can employ their critical-thinking skills to the full.
The learning environment: Active learning in a
supportive school culture
In a classroom based around metacognition, structured inquiry and critical thinking, students will be engaged
and intellectually involved. A number of teaching approaches will be used, depending on the subject, the task
and the age group. These will include whole-class instruction and interaction, individual and group work, role
play or simulation, and also activities centred on an investigation. Whatever the approach, they will all value
the voice of the learner. Students should be consistently engaged with authentic problems and issues and they
should be learning basic skills and knowledge, and developing understanding in these real-world contexts.
The learning environment in a school is the setting and atmosphere in which learning takes place.
It encompasses the corridors, cafeteria, playgrounds and classrooms, as well as the environment beyond
the school. The learning environment of a school is critical. IB programmes require a particular learning
environment that:
fully promotes all the attributes of the IB learnerprofilet
makes the values of the three programmesexplicitt
values the environment beyond the school and recognizes its importance in the lives ofstudentst
values learning and the learner.t
Metacognition, structured inquiry and critical thinking are not recipes for teaching—they are approaches to
teaching and learning that presuppose particular beliefs about the way students learn. Students are unlikely
to risk taking another perspective, challenging an opinion or asking an unusual question if they don’t feel
that intellectual risk-taking, open-mindedness or curiosity are valued and respected. The teacher creates the
learning environment and students are adept at working out what sort of environment has been created,
how that classroom environment fits within the school and, therefore, how they should respond. The learning
environment itself is a resource for learning; it should be stimulating, provocative and promote unobserved
learning.
With an effective learning environment, based on the IB learner profile, the learning of bodies of knowledge
and the mastery of skills, the development of attitudes and dispositions should occur within a context that is
relevant and meaningful to students themselves, to their communities, their local environment and the world.
Knowledge and skills should be approached through a variety of perspectives and be connected to other
areas of learning and contexts in as many ways as possible.
Learning is a process that is facilitated, mediated and modelled by the teacher. IB students must fully
understand the process of learning in order to learn as effectively as possible. All IB teachers need to be
teachers of learning. They must help students understand how they learn best and how their learning is
perceived; they must help them understand the learning environments they may encounter and how to
respond to them; they must help them become learners who are able to reflect purposefully on their progress;
they must encourage them to value learning as an essential, integral and wonderful part of their everyday
lives.
Teaching and learning
Towards a continuum of international education 17
Summary
Students in the PYP, MYP and DP learn best when:
their prior knowledge is considered to beimportantt
learning is incontextt
context isrelevantt
they can learncollaborativelyt
the learning environment isprovocativet
they get appropriate feedback to support theirlearningt
diverse learning styles are understood andaccommodatedt
they feel secure and their ideas are valued andrespectedt
values and expectations areexplicitt
there is a culture of curiosity at theschoolt
they understand how judgments about learning are made, and how to provide evidence of theirt
learning
they become aware of and understand how theylearnt
metacognition, structured inquiry and critical thinking are central to teaching in theschoolt
learning is engaging, challenging, rigorous, relevant andsignificantt
they are encouraged in everything they do in school to become autonomous lifelong learners.t
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation18
Assessment
The principles of IB assessment
Assessment in all three programmes must support and encourage effective teaching and learning in the
classroom. It should be based on professional judgment and should reflect the intercultural dimensions of
the programmes. Assessment is aimed at determining the learners’ levels of understanding. Therefore, it is
essential that teachers determine from the beginning what kind of assessment will allow learners to show
that understanding.
A distinction can be made between:
summative assessment—aimed at determining a student’s achievement level, generally at the end oft
a course of study or unit of work, and
formative assessment—aimed at identifying the learning needs of students and forming part of thet
learning process itself.
Although these two functions are apparently quite distinct, the same assessment instruments can often
be used for either purpose, the difference lying in the way the outcomes of the assessment are interpreted
and applied (Black 1993; Wiliam and Black 1996). The two approaches should interact and be mutually
supportive.
There are key principles of assessment that are common to all three programmes.
Assessment is integral to planning, teaching and learning.t
The assessment system and assessment practices are made clear to students and parents.t
There is a balance between formative and summative assessment.t
Opportunities for peer and self-assessment are planned for.t
Opportunities for students to reflect on their own learning are planned for.t
Students’ current knowledge and experience are assessed before embarking on new learning.t
Students are provided with feedback as a basis for future learning.t
Reporting to parents is meaningful.t
Assessment data is analysed to provide information about the teaching and learning, and the needs oft
individual students.
Assessment is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum.t
Assessment across the continuum
The philosophy of assessment and the IB assessment principles apply to all three programmes. There are key
differences in the assessment systems, in order to:
meet the needs of students at particular ages and stages ofdevelopmentt
incorporate national requirements that schools may have to abidebyt
meet the requirements of higher education institutions around the world.t
There is a progression from wholly internal assessment in the PYP to largely external final assessment in the
DP, with the MYP bridging the gap by keeping final assessment internal but ensuring that it is externally
Assessment
Towards a continuum of international education 19
validated. It is the responsibility of the IB to ensure that the processes and procedures for all three systems are
clearly explained and are transparent to schools and teachers; it is the school’s responsibility to manage the
transition from one system to the next and to ensure that teachers, students and parents fully understand
the nature and practice of each system.
Assessment in the PYP
The prime objective of assessment in the PYP is to provide feedback on the learning process. Assessment is
carried out entirely by PYP teachers; the IB provides overall expectations for each subject area but does not
provide external moderation or examinations.
PYP teachers employ techniques for assessing students’ work that take into account the diverse, complicated
and sophisticated ways that individual students use to make sense of their experiences. The assessment
strategies and tools proposed by the PYP—rubrics, exemplars, anecdotal records, checklists, continuums,
portfolios of work—are designed to accommodate a variety of intelligences and ways of knowing. Where
possible, they provide an effective means of recording students’ responses and performances in real-
life situations that present real problems to solve. These authentic assessment strategies may be used
in conjunction with other forms of assessment, which may include standardized tests, in order to assess
student performance, basic skills levels and the efficacy of the programme.
In the final year of the PYP, students participate in a culminating inquiry, the PYP exhibition. It is both a
transdisciplinary inquiry conducted in a spirit of personal and shared responsibility, as well as a summative
assessment activity that is a celebration and rite of passage, symbolic and actual, from the PYP into the
middle years of schooling (see “The PYP exhibition” in the section “The culminating experience”).
Assessment in the MYP
The primary objective of assessment in the MYP, as with the PYP, is to provide a basis for future learning.
All IB World Schools that offer the MYP are responsible for organizing relevant assessment and reporting
procedures according to the objectives of the programme. The IB provides no external examinations in the
MYP. Assessment is carried out by teachers and relies on their professional expertise in making judgments
based on the prescribed MYP assessment criteria defined in the subject guides. This assessment system
allows schools to incorporate multiple forms of assessment adapted to the learning objectives, including
broad-based examinations where appropriate, as well as national requirements that may be imposed on
them by local circumstances.
Schools are expected to structure both the curriculum and assessment procedures according to the needs
of their students and their local context. All schools must develop assessment procedures based on the
assessment guidelines and criteria described in the MYP subject guides. Teachers must ensure they assess
their students fairly by giving them adequate opportunities to show clearly what they can achieve in relation
to the objectives of each subject. The assessment strategies recommended in the MYP are similar to those
used in the PYP and in the DP.
Schools may request IB-validated grades, on a scale of 1 to 7, issued on official MYP records of achievement
and MYP certificates for students completing the programme. For schools opting for this validation
procedure, standardization of assessment is ensured through a process of external moderation of teachers’
internal assessment. The official MYP subject criteria for year 5 of the programme and corresponding
achievement levels must be used as the basis for results submitted to IB Cardiff. For schools not requesting
IB-validated grades, monitoring of assessment is compulsory at designated intervals to ensure assessment
in the school is meeting the required standard.
In the final year of the MYP, students participate in a culminating project, the personal project, a significant
body of work produced by the student over an extended period and assessed internally by the school. It is
the product of the student’s own initiative and creativity, which must reflect a personal appreciation of the
areas of interaction and the application of skills acquired through approaches to learning. The MYP personal
Assessment
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation20
project, like the PYP exhibition, can be considered a rite of passage into the final years of schooling, and an
excellent preparation for the extended essay in the DP (see “The MYP personal project” in the section “The
culminating experience”).
Assessment in the DP
Formal assessment in the DP is summative assessment, designed to record student achievement at, or
towards, the end of the course of study and used to contribute to the final qualification. Final assessment
is high-stakes, criterion-related performance assessment. However, over the course of the two years,
teachers must engage in assessment for learning, as they do in the PYP and the MYP, using a wide range of
assessment strategies appropriate to the nature of the understanding they are assessing. As in the PYP and
MYP, the single most important aim of assessment in the DP is that it should support and encourage future
learning. Absolute reliability of assessment results, though highly important, cannot take priority over
student learning.
All courses are assessed by IB-appointed external examiners, except for creativity, action, service. Different
assessment models apply to each course of study but all include significant components that are internally
assessed. During their two years of study in the DP, students produce work for internal assessment, some
of which is marked by classroom teachers according to subject-specific criteria, and then moderated by
external examiners. The internal assessment tasks address areas of understanding and competence for
which examinations are less appropriate. Students also complete assessment tasks during the course of
study under the guidance of teachers, which are then externally examined. At the end of the two years of
study students sit examinations in most of the subjects, which are assessed by teams of external examiners.
Two examination sessions are held each year, corresponding to the school years in the southern and
northern hemispheres, and results on a scale of 1 to 7 for each subject are awarded to students.
The extended essay is an in-depth inquiry into a focused topic intended to promote high-level research
and writing skills, intellectual discovery and creativity. It provides students with the opportunity to engage
in personal research into a topic of their own choice. This leads to a major piece of formally presented,
structured writing. As with the PYP exhibition and the MYP personal project, the extended essay can be
seen as a culminating experience, one that prepares students well for some of the academic challenges they
will face in higher education (see “The DP extended essay” in the section “The culminating experience”).
Developing an assessment policy
There is a written assessment policy in place that is available to all sections of
the school community.
Programme standards and practices
It is a requirement that every IB World School has an assessment policy that reflects the school’s philosophy
and position on assessment. Developing an assessment policy is often the catalyst for schools to focus
on their philosophy for assessment and to achieve a common understanding of their aims and objectives
across the programmes.
An assessment policy is a written document that aims to clarify teachers’ understanding of the whole
assessment process within their school setting. It is not a static document but one that is constantly evolving
to reflect the assessment needs of the school. Collaborative reflection is a key component of developing an
assessment policy, and must involve both teaching staff and administrators.
Assessment
Towards a continuum of international education 21
Once an assessment policy has been developed and agreed upon, it will apply across the whole school. A
clear assessment policy needs to be established in the school and communicated to students and parents.
It will include the following.
Purpose for assessment (What and why do we assess?)t
Principles of assessment (What are the characteristics of effective assessments?)t
Assessment practice (How do we assess?)t
When creating an assessment policy, schools need to keep in mind the overall value of the collaborative
process that the school community will go through. The most important thing is the collaboration that must
take place within a school in order to create an assessment policy. Although producing a written document
is the intended outcome, it is the collaborative nature of the process and the associated discussions that
are of most value. By involving those with a vested interest, the assessment policy then truly reflects the
school’s philosophy (see “Leading the development of the continuum: Pedagogical leadership”). A system
should also be put in place to allow regular reviews of the assessment policy.
The following questions can be used to assist a school to establish an assessment policy.
What is the school’s philosophy of assessment?t
How is the school’s philosophy of assessment aligned to its mission statement?t
What practices will be agreed upon in order to fulfill this philosophy?t
What are the purposes of assessment for all the key groups within the school community (students, t
teachers, parents, administrators)?
Schools will find it helpful to develop agreed assessment practices as a part of their assessment policy.
These are practices that are put into place within the school that address how the school assesses, records
and reports student progress.
The following questions can be used to help a school establish agreements on assessment.
How should we structure assessment?t
How often should we assess?t
What do we assess?t
Who is responsible for assessment and how?t
How should assessment information be recorded?t
How should assessment information be analysed and reported?t
How will assessment information be reported to students and parents?t
Who will have access to assessment information and where will it be located?t
How often will we review our assessment practices?t
Are there any mandatory requirements that must be satisfied?t
How will the school combine IB expectations with those of local/national requirements?t
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation22
Leading the development of the continuum:
Pedagogical leadership
Pedagogical leadership is about the effective management of resources—people, time and money—to
ensure the enhancement of the teaching and learning in order to address the overarching mission of the
school. Equally importantly, it is about providing direction and guidance and the modelling of good practice
to ensure high quality teaching and learning throughout the school.
Changes in the classroom can only happen in the context of overall school improvement. Given the vital role
of the school’s leadership in this process, it is clear that the implementation of the continuum of international
education will depend to a large extent on the support and, more importantly, the understanding and
practical involvement of the school’s leadership. This applies to the successful implementation of the three
IB programmes individually, and to the successful implementation and development of the continuum.
What constitutes effective, sustainable leadership?
In an IB World School, effective school leaders must see themselves, first and foremost, as pedagogical
leaders. It may be the case that the vision and drive of one individual, the charismatic leader, may bring
about more immediate innovation, having a marked impact on the entire school community. However,
models of team leadership have overriding benefits in comparison with the charismatic leadership model,
particularly for schools that have a transient population of both teachers and school leaders. Sustainable
pedagogical leadership is the goal, most likely to be achieved when leadership is devolved throughout a
leadership team. This is particularly true in the implementing of the IB programme continuum, which may
take place in one school on one campus, in one school spread across several campuses, or in several schools
across a district.
Given that IB World Schools are communities of learners, school leaders should be mindful of ways to
motivate, challenge and empower teachers to accept and enjoy leadership roles and to support them on
that path. The “distributed leadership model”, whereby “deeper and wider pools of leadership talent” are
developed within the school (Hargreaves and Fink 2006) is the most effective and practical model for the
implementation of the three IB programmes individually, and the implementation of the continuum. Where
teachers take on responsibility for aspects of programme implementation and curriculum development the
chances of sustaining change and effecting school transformation are much greater.
The pedagogical leadership team
The pedagogical leadership team will have overarching responsibility for ensuring that the teaching and
learning will be enriched in line with the philosophical and implementation requirements of IB programmes,
in accordance with the Programme standards and practices.
An effective pedagogical leadership team in a two- or three-programme school or district will include:
the superintendent/head ofschoolt
principals/assistantprincipalst
curriculum coordinator/programme coordinators.t
Leading the development of the continuum: Pedagogical leadership
Towards a continuum of international education 23
A school may decide to appoint a curriculum coordinator/dean of studies/teaching and learning
coordinator—a variety of titles can be used—to focus on the whole curriculum and ensure effective
communication between the programmes and the development of a coherent, whole-school curriculum.
To support the school community fully in implementing the IB programme continuum, the pedagogical
leadership team must be fully informed about all the IB programmes being implemented in the school.
Incoming school leaders who are not familiar with all the IB programmes will need opportunities to learn in
detail about the programmes as part of the induction process.
The IB learner profile is a reference point for the learning, behaviour and attitudes of all within the IB World
School—students and adults—and, as such, is a device to support collaboration, communication and
reflective practice within the pedagogical leadership team.
An effective pedagogical leadership team for the continuum will require time to develop good working
relationships and frequent, open and respectful communication focused on teaching and learning. It is a
requirement of all the programmes that time is allocated for teachers to plan collaboratively. The need for
planning time for the pedagogical leadership team in a two- or three-programme school or district is just as
compelling.
The role of the programme coordinator
The role of the programme coordinator in all three programmes is evolving. Effective implementation of the
programmes requires that the programme coordinator be a member of the pedagogical leadership team
and take a leadership role in advising and working with teachers on the development of the curriculum. The
programme coordinator needs a deep and thorough understanding of the programme in order to support
others in demonstrating their best learning and teaching practices. Administrative work is only part of the
job. Programme coordinators need the time and resources to carry out such a role successfully, especially in
a school that is implementing the continuum. In a two- or three-programme school, the three IB programme
coordinators have an extremely important role to play in programme articulation and ensuring the smooth
transition from one programme to the next.
The model of shared pedagogical leadership that a school decides upon needs to be communicated
throughout the school community. The team is pivotal in shaping and strengthening the programme
continuum and the school community, particularly important in a time of change.
Strategies for developing an effective continuum of international
education
Identify and communicate the roles and responsibilities of each member of the pedagogical leadershipt
team for the programme continuum.
Identify and train teachers to take on responsibilities for pedagogical leadership within grade levelst
and in the classroom.
Develop, in collaboration with specific interest groups, a clear, long-term strategic plan for thet
articulation of the programme continuum, with actions and a timeline for its implementation.
Structure activities to develop the continuum collaboratively.t
Organize the schedule to allow for a variety of ongoing collaborative planning opportunities, t
involving principals, programme coordinators and classroom teachers, as appropriate, for the vertical
articulation of the academic disciplines and other key areas of the continuum (for example, learning
through service to the community, academic honesty).
Ensure that all teachers and administrators have access to the documentation for all IB programmes.t
Leading the development of the continuum: Pedagogical leadership
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation24
Ensure that every new teacher and new administrator is informed about all the IB programmes throught
an induction process.
Regularly arrange general sessions about IB programmes for the whole school community and fort
interest groups within the community (for example, parents).
Demonstrate reflective leadership practice that values feedback.t
Develop policies and procedures including whole-school policies for language, special educationalt
needs, assessment and academic honesty.
Supporting ongoing professional development
The pedagogical leadership team has a responsibility to encourage the learning of everyone in an IB World
School. This is clearly reinforced by defining an IB learner profile that is applicable to all, not just to students.
Alignment with the IB mission statement also requires the school to demonstrate that it values the concept
of lifelong learning.
In an IB World School, or a district, that is implementing two or three programmes, opportunities should be
provided for both teachers and school leaders to not only learn about the content of the other programmes
but to see them in action. Observing classes and talking with colleagues in another programme will not only
broaden teachers’ understanding of IB programmes, but also of the learning experience of the students.
The transitions between programmes will then become clearer and more meaningful to teachers and, in
turn, to the students. Such interaction and dialogue will also strengthen the school community.
Equally, time and resources allocated for teachers and school leaders across programmes to plan, develop
and implement collaboratively key areas of the continuum such as policies on language, assessment, special
educational needs and academic honesty will provide very rich professional development opportunities in
their own right.
As the number of two- and three-programme schools grows, the IB will provide more formal professional
development opportunities for teachers and school leaders through cross-programme workshops and
conferences.
Towards a continuum of international education 25
The language continuum
Language stands at the center of the many interdependent cognitive, affective,
and social factors that shape learning.
David Corson (1999, p 88)
A continuum of learning language, learning through language and learning about language (Halliday 1980)
is woven through the three IB programmes. Learning in more than one language is considered essential to
an international education and for enriching intercultural understanding. Consequently, there are language
requirements, as well as language learning opportunities, built into all three programmes (see the IB
document Programme standards and practices).
The IB learner profile describes a communicator as someone who understands and expresses ideas
and information confidently and creatively in more than one language and in a variety of modes of
communication. In the PYP an additional language is introduced to students by the age of 7; MYP students
must register in two languages for the MYP certificate; in the DP students must study two languages—a
best” language and a second language—to achieve a full diploma.
Language, however, is not separated from overall learning. As the main tool for building our knowledge
of the universe and ourselves, language is crucial for success across the whole curriculum in each of the
IB programmes. Language is integral to exploring and sustaining personal growth and cultural identity;
it is closely linked to the development of a healthy self-esteem and emotional well-being, both of which
are necessary for successful learning to take place. Maintaining and developing the mother tongue of all
learners is especially important in this respect.
As well as being the major medium of social communication, language is tightly linked to cognitive growth;
it is fundamental to the processes by which meaning and knowledge are negotiated and constructed. The
language of academic discourses, along with the concepts and bodies of knowledge of any one discipline are
closely interwoven. The features of different discourses have been identified and are described in linguistic
genre theory. A linguistic genre is a particular text type created by a specific communicative situation.
As learners build understanding through transdisciplinary inquiry in the PYP, and through interdisciplinary
and disciplinary learning in the MYP and DP, they move along a continuum of increasing ability to use and
understand the range of academic linguistic genres in reading, writing, speaking and listening.
Learning in a language other than a mother tongue
in IB programmes
As a result of the global population becoming more mobile, an increasing number of learners in all three
IB programmes have rich and complex multilingual backgrounds. The language profile of a learner may
demonstrate two or more languages at various stages of development in his or her learning continuum.
Many learners in IB programmes are in fact learning through a language that is not their mother tongue.
These learners are potentially able to become “balanced bilinguals” who are highly proficient, literate
and knowledgeable in two or more languages. The IB recognizes the value of this language diversity in
developing internationally minded and interculturally aware people. The IB also sees the consequent need
to provide guidelines for schools on practices that nurture the full language learning potential of all learners
wherever they are on the continuum. When good practices are in place, based on a thorough understanding
The language continuum
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation26
of how language exerts an impact on learning, these ensure that there will be equal access to the curriculum
for all learners, including those who are learning in a language other than their mother tongue.
A wealth of expertise on good practices that promote successful language learning along the continuum
is now available as a result of prolific research in education, as well as schools’ creative responses to the
challenges presented by classroom populations that are no longer monolingual and monocultural. The IB is
committed to sharing this expertise with all stakeholders through documentation and through workshops
for professional development.
The following conditions must exist for effective language learning to take place.
A conceptual understanding by teachers of how language and learning are connected in thet
continuum is critical in understanding why all IB teachers are teachers of language, and how they can
be effective as language teachers no matter what their academic specialism.
New learning is constructed on previous conceptual understandings and so activating prior learningt
and building up necessary knowledge is important good practice, particularly when the group is
diverse and learners do not necessarily share the same cultural or linguistic background. Language
profiles of students are practical documents that can help teachers be aware of the diversity within a
class.
Scaffolding for understanding enables learners to accomplish a task that would be impossible withoutt
such a strategy and is an effective way to extend learning. Scaffolding includes strategies such as
graphic organizers and concept mapping.
Language is integral to identity, which in turn determines how a person will act. Therefore, it is criticalt
that the self-esteem of every learner is affirmed. The culture of the classroom should be collaborative
and inclusive, and should provide an environment where students feel able to take risks in their
language learning.
The development of structures and systems for the support and maintenance of students’ mothert
tongues is vital to support students in their cognitive development.
Developing a school language policy
The process of developing a language policy provides an excellent opportunity to consider how the
continuum of language learning is articulated at the beginning and end of any programme, and from one
programme to the next. It is also an opportunity to discover any ambiguities and contradictions in beliefs
and practices within the school.
The process requires that all implications for language learning across the continuum are made explicit. For
example, where the host country’s language is different from the language of learning in the IB programmes,
consideration needs to be given to how it can be incorporated into the curriculum. Another implication is
likely to be in the provision of support for mother-tongue development and maintenance for those students
who are learning in another language. It might be considered whether such support could be incorporated
into the programmes as the additional language in the PYP, as a language A or B option in the MYP or as
a special-request language, or language A or B, in the DP. Long-term planning for language development
along the continuum is important for successful learning and parents should be a part of this planning.
Channels and systems of communication to keep parents informed and encourage their input should be
made clear in a language policy.
The language continuum
Towards a continuum of international education 27
The conditions and practices that need to be in place for successful language learning may also have
an impact on the school’s admissions policy, the assessment policy, professional development and staff
recruitment.
The role of language across the programme continuum is crucial in nurturing the full development of each
learner and fostering the values of diversity, international-mindedness and intercultural awareness. The
development of an effective language policy will focus the attention of the whole school community on this
most fundamental dimension of the curriculum and school life.
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation28
Special educational needs
Introduction
With the increase in inclusive practices and a growing awareness of the rights of parents and students,
perceptions of special educational needs (SEN) are changing in the wider community and in education in
particular. In recent years there has been a major shift towards locating special education within mainstream
education.
Historically, special education was based on two assumptions:
not all curriculums are accessible to allstudentst
students with special needs should be withdrawn from certain classes to develop skills identified ast
lacking.
The special education teacher was separate from the class/subject teachers and was often consulted only
after a difficulty or issue became identified as a problem. Changes have taken place over time that have
altered the focus on the student from a deficit/medical model to identifying the student’s learning style,
scaffolding their learning and differentiating the curriculum in order to show their true potential. The focus
has shifted from studying differences between learners to learning for all, and it is constantly evolving.
There is now a shift from specialist teachers solving issues to those issues being the responsibility of all
teachers who are part of a student’s education. In all three IB programmes it is the class/subject teacher’s
role both to convey the content of a lesson and to teach students the learning processes required for
reasoning, inquiring, analysis and problem solving in a particular academic domain. Teaching generic
learning strategies divorced from academic content is likely to result in students’ failure to apply these
strategies when it really counts, both in an academic and a social context.
The IB recognizes the difficulties associated with attempting to find a universal term that is understood in
any context. Selecting a term that is acceptable internationally, easily recognizable and indicates a student’s
assessment needs is difficult. The generic term “special educational needs (SEN)” has been adopted since it
caters for the wide spectrum of need along a continuum, including the gifted and talented.
Special educational needs in IB programmes
The responsibility of IB teachers
All IB teachers will teach students with special educational needs (SEN) and, therefore, need to know:
the factors that affect student learning and how best to respond tothemt
how to differentiate and match teaching approaches to student needst
how to differentiate and match teaching approaches to a school’s SENpolicyt
how to make use of technology that has assisted in alleviating and removing barriers to learning.t
If all these aspects are addressed in some way then transformational learning for all involved will take place.
Special educational needs
Towards a continuum of international education 29
The role of SEN teachers in IB World Schools
The SEN teacher is often pivotal in ensuring the success of students with special educational needs along
their educational pathway. The role may change as a student progresses through the programmes and
increases their independence in learning, but communication to key staff about a student’s needs and history
is an essential part of the work of an SEN teacher. A history of each student should be well documented; it
may include the following:
background details of past experiences and familysituationt
copies of past assessments or a summarydocumentt
yearly reports from the SEN teacher, assistants oraidest
samples of student work from a variety of academicareast
a note if other relevant information is heldelsewheret
minutes of meetings with family, student, staff and otherprofessionalst
any special interventions and strategies employed so far to assist learning.t
Collaborative planning between SEN staff and class/subject teachers in designing units of work, co-teaching
and implementing strategies that support their students will enable equal access to the curriculum for all
students, as well as supporting cooperative group learning. Collaborative teaching will require changes
in the roles and responsibilities of school personnel and administrative support if the benefits are to
encompass all involved.
SEN in the Primary Years Programme
Every student is seen as special within the PYP and the class teacher is responsible for understanding the
needs of each individual within their class and catering to their learning styles. The relationship between
class teachers and other support staff within the PYP is seen as being collaborative and cooperative where
all are actively involved in the planning processes that support teaching and learning.
Early intervention is a critical aspect of developing effective learning, with regular assessments (formal and
informal) of progress, not against others, but of a student’s individual growth, which covers not only the
cognitive domain but also the physical, affective and social domains.
Development during the early years is seen as a dynamic, two-way process wherein the student’s
characteristics (nature) both influence and are influenced by the child-rearing context (nurture).
Interventions designed to decrease risk factors and strengthen resilience provide a firm basis for strong
future development along the programme continuum. These mechanisms will be age-appropriate, will
reflect the growth, interests and talents of the student and will have a long-term impact on the final
outcomes in the last years of a student’s education.
SEN in the Middle Years Programme
The MYP is designed as an inclusive programme, catering for all students in the 11–16 age range. The central
place of the areas of interaction, and in particular the approaches to learning, helps teachers and students
respond in a flexible way to varied learning needs, including individual needs related to language acquisition
for second-language students, or special educational needs of all kinds.
A critical stage in learning and development, which is closely related to personal and emotional well-
being, occurs during the MYP years and can have a huge impact on academic learning and motivation.
The MYP supports students during a vulnerable time in their education, when many are struggling with
issues of identity and self-esteem. The caring and safe environment fostered within the MYP encourages
them to explore issues related to themselves and the wider community. It allows them to make significant
connections both within and outside the school, which will enhance all aspects of their growth: academic,
Special educational needs
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation30
social and emotional. During these years it is the exploration and consolidation of good learning strategies
that will enable students with special educational needs to achieve successful outcomes.
It is important that procedures and processes are put in place in good time to support students as they pass
through the MYP programme. This may involve differentiating the curriculum, using particular teaching
strategies such as scaffolding to enable students to access the content in some subject areas, as well as the
use of assistive technology. Specific arrangements may include:
extra time to completetaskst
using a computer withspellcheckt
using a scribe to record points ofviewt
employing a reader to access dense text.t
These are all valuable strategies and may lead to “special arrangements” being granted by the IB for the
student during their years in the DP.
In the MYP the only time there needs to be a formal application for exemption or special arrangements is
with regard to issues that may prevent a student from completing some aspect of a subject or fulfilling all
the requirements of the course at the end of year 5 of the programme. These details should be filled out on
the appropriate form and forwarded to IB Cardiff prior to the end of MYP year 3.
The MYP establishes a sound foundation in skill development and preparedness for further learning.
Many effective learning strategies should be in place by the end of the MYP years for the student to work
independently and successfully in the DP.
SEN in the Diploma Programme
The DP has well-established support mechanisms for special educational needs students outlined in the
publication Candidates with special assessment needs. The identification of any student with a learning issue
must be completed prior to starting the programme. Various professional assessments of the student may
have been carried out over a number of years but the most recent, not more than two years old, should be
used as evidence on entering the programme to support an application for special arrangements. There are
two procedures in place to cater for special requirements at any time via the D1 and D2 application process,
which coordinators are made aware of in the Handbook of procedures for the Diploma Programme.
Special arrangements” that can be authorized by IB Cardiff once the correct procedure has been followed
include:
modifications to exam papers—size of font, colouredpapert
extensions todeadlinest
assistance with practicalworkt
additionaltimet
restperiodst
information and communicationtechnologyt
amanuenses/scribe andtranscriptiont
readers.t
These arrangements may be used for both internal and external assessments although the formal request is
only required for the external arrangements.
Special educational needs
Towards a continuum of international education 31
The programme coordinator has a particular role and responsibilities towards students with special
educational needs. It is important to bear in mind the following points when requesting special
arrangements.
Consultation must be done prior to a student beginning the programme.t
The history of the individual student’s case must be well established; careful subject selection ist
required for the student.
Documentation must be complete and up to date according to the requirements described in thet
document Candidates with special assessment needs.
The coordinator is the signatory for all documentation, even if it is collated by others.t
It must not be assumed in advance that any particular application will be successful; each is decidedt
on its own merits.
All teachers should be fully informed about a student’s particular needs from the outset. If a teacher has
concerns about a student’s ability to learn effectively in a particular class, it is essential the teacher discusses
these concerns with others at a very early stage rather than wait until it is too late. Many students who have
considerable ability are able to mask their particular needs until they are challenged by the demands of a
course that stretches their intellectual ability, as well as their management and organizational skills.
Developing an SEN policy and programme
Where schools offer two or three IB programmes the continuation of support for students with special
educational needs and the flow of information should result in a smooth transition both for the student and
the teaching staff.
When considering how to support students with special educational needs across the IB programme
continuum there are a number of questions that may guide the development of an effective SEN programme
and a school SEN policy.
What are the local, national and international legal requirements of teachers in meeting the needs oft
all students?
What is the extent of our students’ special educational needs at present?t
What expertise do we already have?t
What expertise will we need?t
What do we already do for SEN students?t
Which testing or screening tools do we have access to?t
Which tests are our staff qualified to administer?t
Who will be responsible for notifying parents, students and teachers of testing results?t
How will we document our provision for SEN?t
How will the provision for SEN be structured, coordinated and monitored?t
How will our provision for SEN be supported by our professional development programme?t
What information should we hold on our SEN students, where should it be held and who shouldt
manage it?
Who will have access to student files?t
How will we coordinate the passing on of information at transition stages—changing schools, movingt
from one IB programme to the next?
Where do we need to improve our provision for SEN students?t
Special educational needs
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation32
In conclusion, the transitory nature of many students participating in IB programmes places additional
pressure on schools to provide the most appropriate teaching and learning. Greater awareness of the ways
and means to collate, maintain and communicate useful data about students is essential to meaningful
progression along the IB programme continuum whether it is within schools or between schools.
LEGAL PERSPECTIVES FOR
DISABILITY & DISCRIMINATION
t PDBM
t 3FHJPOBM
t OUFSOBUJPOBM
SCHOOL ASSESSMENTS
t PSNBUJWF
t 4VNNBUJWF
t 0CTFSWBUJPOT
t JBHOPTUJD
t 8PSL TBNQMFT
t 1PSUGPMJP
EXTERNAL PROFESSIONAL
ASSESSMENTS
t 1TZDIPMPHJTU
t 1TZDIJBUSJTU
t 4QFFDI UIFSBQZ
t 0DDVQBUJPOBM UIFSBQZ
t FEJDBM
DOCUMENTATION
t 4&/QPMJDZ SFQPSUT
t 1SPGFTTJPOBM SFQPSUT
t OEJWJEVBMJ[FE FEVDBUJPO
plan
t VOEJOH
recommendations
t 1BSFOU MFUUFST
Special needs staff utilize all this information to work collaboratively with class teachers
to develop appropriate programmes for teaching and learning for all students
SUPPORT MECHANISMS
t 5FBDIJOH BTTJTUBOU JEF
t 3FTPVSDF SPPN
t TTJTUJWF UFDIOPMPHZ
t 4QFDJBM BSSBOHFNFOUT
t 4QFDJBMJTU TUBGG
Figure 3:
Developing an effective whole-school SEN programme
Towards a continuum of international education 33
Action, community and service, and CAS
Central to all three IB programmes, is the belief that education must extend beyond the intellectual to
include not only socially responsible attitudes but also thoughtful and appropriate action. Learning through
experience is fundamental to teaching and learning in IB programmes. In the PYP, MYP and DP, an attention
to service to fellow students and to the larger community both in and outside school is expected of students.
Through such service, students are able to grow both personally and socially, developing skills such as
cooperation, problem solving, conflict resolution and creative and critical thinking, as well as developing
their own identities. It is also through service that IB students may make the connections between their
academic studies and real life. These actions are ways in which IB students demonstrate their commitment
to the attributes of the learner profile. The actions that students choose to take with regard to their fellow
students, and to their local or the wider community, may be considered the most significant summative
assessment of the efficacy of the IB continuum of international education.
In each of the programmes, the role of the teacher in enabling students to choose their action, in facilitating
this action and encouraging students to reflect on the action they undertake is vital.
What is encouraged or required of students in this dimension of the programme varies according to the
developmental levels of the students and what is acceptable and reasonable for particular age groups.
There is a clear continuum in the “action” of the PYP, “community and service” in the MYP and “creativity,
action, service” (CAS) in the DP. The terminology differs because it describes as accurately as possible the
component for that programme, each of which has some particular characteristics, but the principles are
the same.
Action in the PYP
An explicit expectation of the PYP is that successful inquiry will lead to responsible action, initiated by the
student as a result of the learning process. This action will extend the student’s learning, or it may have a
wider social impact. IB World Schools that offer the PYP should meet the challenge of giving all learners the
opportunity and the power to choose to act; to decide on their actions; and to reflect on these actions in
order to make a difference in and to the world.
In the PYP action should be seen as a voluntary demonstration of a student’s empowerment in the context
of the expectations laid down in the programme. The complex issues of the 21st century do not often
suggest simple or self-evident solutions, and so inaction may also be a legitimate choice; indeed, sometimes,
inaction may be the best choice.
The PYP advocates a cycle of involvement that provides students with opportunities to engage in purposeful
and beneficial action, some of which may involve service to fellow students or the school community.
Action, community and service, and CAS
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation34
The PYP action cycle
Reflect Choose
Act
Figure 4:
The PYP action cycle
In the PYP effective action does not need to be grandiose. It can begin at the most immediate and basic
level: with the self; within the family; within the classroom, the hallways and the playground. Effective
action can be a demonstration of a sense of responsibility and respect for self, others and the environment.
For younger children, the cycle of action helps them to develop the core of values and understanding
upon which awareness of themselves within society and a sense of responsibility toward that society will,
hopefully, grow.
Community and service in the MYP
In the MYP, action is also at the heart of community and service, which is one of the five areas of interaction.
In early adolescence, the emphasis is on developing community awareness and understanding and a
sense of responsibility toward the community, so that students become engaged and empowered to act
in response to the needs of the community. Students are encouraged to look beyond the classroom, so
that they discover the social reality of self, others and communities, and this awareness, in turn, may initiate
involvement and service. Student reflection on the needs of the community and their ability to participate
in and respond to the needs of the community contribute to the development of caring and responsible
global citizens as described in the IB learner profile.
Action, community and service, and CAS
Towards a continuum of international education 35
Reflection
Action
Awareness and
understanding
Figure 5:
The MYP inquiry cycle
In addition to requiring students to participate in the communities in which they live, community and
service is incorporated into the study of the eight subject areas in the MYP so that responsible citizenship is
encouraged as students deepen their knowledge and understanding of the world around them and how it
relates to the relevant subject areas.
In the MYP, the emphasis with younger students is on developing an awareness of community; as the
programme continues, there is a growing involvement in service to the community, in line with students’
increasing maturity and autonomy. This strand is taken up in the service component of creativity, action,
service (CAS) in the DP and in the increased importance of student-initiated activity.
Creativity, action, service in the DP
Creativity, action, service (CAS) is at the heart of the DP. It is one of the three elements at the core of the
hexagon that are essential in every student’s diploma. It involves students in a range of activities alongside
their academic studies throughout the DP. The three strands of CAS, which are often interwoven in particular
activities, are characterized as follows.
Creativity:t Arts and other experiences that involve creative thinking
Action:t Physical exertion contributing to a healthy lifestyle, complementing academic work elsewhere
in the DP
Please note that “action” in the DP is defined differently from “action” in the PYP.)
Service:t Unpaid and voluntary, an exchange that has a learning benefit for the student. The rights,
dignity and autonomy of all those involved are respected.
CAS enables students to enhance their personal and interpersonal development through experiential
learning. At the same time, it provides an important counterbalance to the academic pressures of the rest
of the programme. A good CAS programme should be both challenging and enjoyable, a personal journey
of self-discovery. Each individual student has a different starting point, and therefore different goals and
needs, but for many their CAS activities include experiences that are profound and life-changing.
Action, community and service, and CAS
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation36
CAS should involve:
real, purposeful activities with significantoutcomest
personalchallenget
thoughtful consideration and reflection on outcomes and personal learning.t
The emphasis in CAS is on helping students to develop their own identities, in accordance with the values
embodied in the IB mission statement and the IB learner profile. The cycle of experiential learning in CAS is a
useful elaboration of the PYP action cycle.
Figure 6:
The DP cycle of experiential learning
Action and community service activities provide ideal opportunities for students in different IB programmes
to work together and interact. Older students are ideally placed to assist younger students and their
teachers in classroom and extra-curricular activities. Service activities that are appropriate for all age groups
encourage purposeful and genuine interaction across the age ranges and the building of friendships. Even
more importantly, they provide opportunities for older students to become strong role models for younger
students.
Towards a continuum of international education 37
The culminating experience
In the final year of each of the IB programmes, all students complete a programme-specific inquiry that
allows them to demonstrate a consolidation of their learning, in the case of the PYP and MYP, and to
demonstrate the extension and development of their learning in the DP. All three inquiries are carried
out over an extended period of time and require considerable commitment and the application of both
academic and personal skills on the part of students. In these inquiries the students are guided through the
process by teachers or supervisors and given formative feedback throughout; parents are fully informed
about the nature of the inquiries and the work that is expected from the students.
The PYP exhibition
The exhibition represents a significant event in the life of both the school and the student, synthesizing the
essential elements of the PYP and sharing them with the whole school community. It is an opportunity for
students in their final year of the programme to exhibit the attributes of the IB learner profile that have been
developing throughout their engagement with the PYP.
The PYP exhibition differs from previous work students will have undertaken in the PYP in that the students
take charge more fully of the inquiry, including identification of a real-life issue to be explored. The central
idea of the inquiry must be of sufficient scope and significance to warrant detailed investigation by all
students in the final year of the PYP. The exhibition includes regular and carefully planned assessment.
The exhibition is “staged” to present the findings of the inquiry and to display evidence of student learning
that has been ongoing through the process. The staging can incorporate many formats, such as interactive
displays, debates, student-led workshops, drama performances or often a combination of formats. The
audience for this staging may be other students in the school, parents, teachers and specially invited guests.
Exhibition inquiries will often have local significance, and some schools take their exhibitions out into the
community to present to local interest groups. Ideally the PYP exhibition will make a lasting impact on the
community.
The MYP personal project
The personal project is a significant body of work produced by the student over an extended period in the
final year of the MYP. It is the product of the student’s own initiative and creativity, which must reflect a
personal appreciation of the areas of interaction and the application of skills acquired through approaches
to learning.
In the PYP exhibition, there is a strong collaborative element as students are working around the same
theme or issue, whereas in the MYP personal project students work independently and are encouraged to
follow their own interests and select a subject that they want to work on, without any necessary reference
to topics or subjects studied during the programme. The personal project could be as diverse as making a
guitar and giving a concert, or researching and writing about the history of the Igbo tribe of Nigeria. All the
projects involve elements of research and reflection, as well as the formal presentation of both process and
outcomes. The personal project recognizes the growing independence of young adolescents and provides
them with an opportunity to follow their passions or concerns.
The culminating experience
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation38
The DP extended essay
The extended essay is highly academic in nature. It is an in-depth, individual inquiry into a focused topic
from the list of approved DP subjects—normally one of the student’s six chosen subjects for the diploma. It
is intended to promote high-level research and writing skills, intellectual discovery and creativity. It provides
students with an opportunity to engage in personal research into a topic of their own choice. This leads to
a major piece of formally presented, structured writing, in which ideas and findings are communicated in a
reasoned and coherent manner, appropriate to the subject chosen. The extended essay is the prime example
in the DP of a piece of work where the student has the opportunity to show knowledge, understanding and
enthusiasm about a topic of his or her choice.
Opportunities for celebration
These three experiences are highly significant events in the lives of IB students. For students who study one
or all three programmes, they are rites of passage. For a two- or three-programme school or district, they
provide ideal opportunities for school and community celebration. The PYP exhibition is designed to be just
that; teachers, parents and students from the MYP and DP should be encouraged to visit it and talk with the
PYP students. Similarly, the completion of the personal projects in the final year of the MYP leads very well
into a presentation evening or an MYP exhibition of personal projects that will include performances and
live presentations. The extended essay does not lend itself so well to such a presentation event, but extracts
could be published in school journals or copies placed in the library for other students to read.
It is important that the school provides opportunities for students to talk with both younger and older
students about their participation in these culminating experiences, possibly at assemblies or in small
groups. It might even be possible for older students to co-tutor younger students, along with a teacher.
It is also important in a school that is implementing the continuum that students, teachers and parents are
aware of significant events, such as these culminating experiences, occurring in all three programmes. This
will deepen knowledge and understanding of each of the IB programmes and create a level of excitement
and anticipation among students and their parents that will serve to strengthen the community, giving it
opportunities for celebration that will develop into the rituals that bind a school community together.
Towards a continuum of international education 39
Programme evaluation
Programme evaluation in the PYP, the MYP and the DP is both a requirement of and a service provided by
the IB for all IB World Schools. The main purposes of programme evaluation are:
to assess the implementation of the programmes in eachschoolt
to assist the school in developing and maintaining dynamic programmes that reflect the philosophyt
and the programme standards and practices of the IB.
Programme evaluation is not a re-authorization of the school. It allows the regional office to work closely
with the school in its ongoing development of the programmes; it is also an opportunity for the IB to ensure
on a regular basis that the standards and practices of the programmes are being maintained.
The three IB programmes are not static systems. They are essentially evolutionary, requiring adjustment and
development in the light of experience. The IB supports schools in all stages of development of the PYP, the
MYP and the DP by providing documentation, information seminars and professional development events.
For the PYP and the MYP, there are organized visits by IB staff and/or nominated, experienced practitioners.
Programme evaluation does not seek to appraise or assess individual teachers or students. It will be
successful in achieving its aims only if a multiplicity of stakeholders is included: teachers, programme
coordinators, administrators, students, parents, board members.
Programme evaluation occurs between three and five years after official authorization to offer the
programme, and every five years thereafter. It involves three important stages.
The self-study (PYP, MYP and DP)
The important process of self-study, guided by a questionnaire, involves the whole school in its own
assessment of its delivery of the programmes. The responses to the self-study should be the outcomes of
discussions and of reflections on the evidence gathered in the process. For the PYP and the MYP, the self-
study precedes and contributes to the programme evaluation visit.
There is no mandatory on-site evaluation visit for the DP, but in addition to the self-study, where necessary,
the regional office may seek further information or organize a visit.
The school visit (PYP and MYP)
The programme evaluation visit is mandatory for all IB World Schools that offer the PYP and/or the MYP. It
ensures the quality of programmes, while offering feedback to each school. The programme evaluation visit
aims to be diagnostic and constructively critical, and is intended to:
support the school’s self-evaluationprocessest
inform the school’s curriculum developmentactivitiest
assist effective management and allocation of resources.t
Programme evaluation
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation40
The evaluation report (PYP, MYP and DP)
The regional office will respond formally to the school—upon receipt of the completed self-study
questionnaire in the case of the DP, and after the programme evaluation visit for the PYP and the MYP—with
commendations, recommendations and, where appropriate, matters to be addressed by the school.
Evaluation of the programme continuum
Schools that offer more than one consecutive IB programme may request a cross-programme evaluation.
This would mean all programmes in the school, including the DP, undertaking the process of self-study,
completing the Programme evaluation self-study questionnaire and receiving a joint evaluation visit
simultaneously. Schools may choose to opt for this process as a means of reflecting on whole-school
development, and planning for whole-school improvement. Each programme will be as carefully and
thoroughly evaluated as it would be under a single programme evaluation and the teams will also address
the articulation of the programmes. This process is not available for schools that offer only the PYP and the
DP.
For a cross-programme evaluation the guiding principles remain the same as for the single programme
evaluations, except that the DP will also receive a visit.
Towards a continuum of international education 41
Bibliography
Bartlett, K. 1992. “Defining International Education: A Proposal for the Future”. International Schools Journal,
number 23, pp 45–52.
Bartlett, K. 1996. “Articulating the International Curriculum: Continuity through Commonalities (Part 1)”.
International Schools Journal. Vol.16, number 1, pp 30–8.
Bartlett, K. 1997. “Articulating the International Curriculum: Continuity through Outcomes (Part 2)”.
International Schools Journal. Vol.17, number 1, pp 50–7.
Bartlett, K. 1998. “International Curricula: More or Less Important at the Primary Level?” in International
Education: Principles and Practice, edited by Hayden, M and Thompson, J. Kogan Page, pp 77–91.
Black, PJ. (1993) “Assessment policy and public confidence: Comments on the BERA Policy Task Group’s
article, ‘Assessment and the improvement of education’”. The Curriculum Journal. Vol.4, number 3, pp 421–7.
Boyer, EL. 1995. The Basic School: A community for learning. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
Teaching. 0-931050-48-0.
Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Words. Harvard University Press. 0-674-00366-7.
Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press. 0-674-00361-6.
Chandler, D. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. Routledge. 0-415-35111-1.
Coles, MJ and Southworth, G. 2005. Developing Leadership. Creating the Schools of Tomorrow. Open University
Press. 0-335-21542-4.
Corson, D. 1999. Language Policy in Schools: A Resource for Teachers and Administrators. Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates. 0-8058-3296-3.
Corson, D. 2001. Language Diversity and Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 0-8058-3449-4.
Costa, AL (editor). 2001. Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking (3rd edition). Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-379-0.
Costa, AL and Kallick, B (editors). 2000. Assessing and Reporting on Habits of Mind. Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-370-7.
Costa, AL and Kallick, B (editors). 2000. Discovering and Exploring Habits of Mind. Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-368-5.
DeVries, R, Zan, B, Hildebrandt, C, Edmiaston, R, and Sales, C. 2002. Developing Constructivist Early Childhood
Curriculum. Practical principles and activities. Teachers College Press. 0-8077-4120-5.
Eisner, EW. 1985. The Educational Imagination On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs (2nd edition).
Macmillan Publishing Company. 0-02-332110-5.
Eisner, EW. 2001. “The Role of the Arts in Cognition and Curriculum” in Developing Minds: A Resource
Book for Teaching Thinking (3rd edition), edited by Costa, AL. Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development. 0-87120-379-0.
Fullan, M. 2001. Leading in a Culture of Change. Jossey-Bass. 0-7879-5395-4.
Fullan, M. 2001. The New Meaning of Educational Change (3rd edition). RoutledgeFalmer. 0-415-26020-5.
Bibliography
Towards a continuum of internationaleducation42
Gallas, K. 1994. The Languages of Learning. How children talk, write, dance, draw, and sing their understanding
of the world. Teachers College Press. 0-8077-3305-9.
Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic books. 0-465-01822-X.
Grennon Brooks, J and Brooks, MG. 2001. In Search of Understanding. The Case for Constructivist Classrooms.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-211-5.
Halliday, M. 1980. “Three Aspects of Children’s Language Development: Learning language, Learning
through Language, Learning about Language”, in Oral and Written Language Development Research, edited
by Goodman, Y, Haussler, MH and Strickland, D. National Council of Teachers of English, pp 7–19.
Hargreaves, A and Fink, D. 2006. Sustainable Leadership. Jossey-Bass. 0-7879-6838-2.
Hargreaves, D. 1998. Creative Professionalism: The role of teachers in the knowledge society. Arguments 22.
Demos. 1-898309-79-5.
Hayden, M, Thompson, J and Walker, G (editors). 2002. International Education in Practice: Dimensions for
national and international schools. Kogan Page Limited. 0-7494-3835-5.
Hayes Jacobs, H. 1989. Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-165-8.
Hayes Jacobs, H. 1997. Mapping the Big Picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-286-7.
Kozulin, A, Gindis, B, Ageyev, VS, and Miller, SM (editors). 2003. Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural
Context (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive & Computational Perspectives). Cambridge University Press.
0-5215-2883-6.
Lynn Erickson, H. 2001. Stirring the Head, Heart, and Soul: Redefining curriculum and instruction (2nd edition).
Corwin Press. 0-8039-6885-X.
Lynn Erickson, H. 2002. Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction: Teaching beyond the facts. Corwin Press.
0-7619-4640-3.
McTighe, J and Wiggins, G. 1999. The Understanding by Design Handbook. Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development. 0-87120-340-5.
McTighe, J and Wiggins, G. 2004. Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook. Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 0-87120-855-5.
Olson, DR and Torrance, N (editors). 1998. The Handbook of Education and Human Development. New Models
of Learning, Teaching and Schooling. Blackwell Publishers. 0-631-21186-1.
Perkins, D. 1995. Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. The Free Press. 0-02-925212-1.
Peterson, ADC. 1987. Schools Across Frontiers: The Story of the International Baccalaureate and the United World
Colleges. Open Court. 0-8126-90146-X.
Project Zero. 2001. Making Learning Visible. Children as individual and group learners. Reggio Children.
88-87960-25-9.
Renaud, G. 1991. “The international schools association, historical and philosophical background” in World
Yearbook of Education 1991: International Schools and International Education, edited by Jonietz, PL and Harris,
NDC. Kogan Page.
Selley, N. 1999. The Art of Constructivist Teaching in the Primary School. A Guide for Students and Teachers. David
Fulton Publishers. 1-85346-572-0.
Bibliography
Towards a continuum of international education 43
Short, KG and Burke, C. 1991. Creating Curriculum: Teachers and students as a community of learners.
Heinemann. 0-435-08590-5.
Short, KG, Harste, JC and Burke, C. 1996. Creating Classrooms for Authors and Inquirers (2nd edition).
Heinemann. 0-435-08850-5.
Short, KG, Schroeder, J, Laird, J, Kauffman, G, Ferguson, M and Crawford, K. 1996. Learning Together Through
Inquiry. From Columbus to Integrated Curriculum. Stenhouse Publishers. 978-157110-033-7.
Tobin, K (editor). 1995. The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
0-8058-1878-2.
Vygotsky, L. 1999. Thought and Language. The MIT Press. 0-262-72010-8.
Walker, G. 2000. Linking the Primary Years, Middle Years and Diploma Programmes of the IBO: an educational
series, not an educational serial. International Baccalaureate Organization.
Wells Lindfor, J. 1999. Children’s Inquiry: Using language to make sense of the world. Teachers College Press.
0-8077-3836-0.
Wiggins, G. 1998. Educative Assessment. Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance.
Jossey-Bass Publishers. 0-7879-0848-7.
Wiggins, G and McTighe, J. 2005. Understanding by Design. Expanded 2nd edition. Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development. 1-4166-0035-3.
Wiliam, D and Black, P. 1996. “Meanings and Consequences: A Basis for Distinguishing Formative and
Summative Functions of Assessment”. British Educational Research Journal. Vol.22, pp 537–48.
Williams, B and Woods, M. 1997. “Building on Urban Learners’ Experiences”. Educational Leadership, April,
pp 29–32.