Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDiploma Programme(DP)and Advanced Placement(AP) To-. Tom Brymer, Superintendent Diploma Programme(DP)and Advanced Placement(AP) 2010 Performance Report Westlake Academy Stacy Stoyanoff,Diploma Programme Coordinator Westlake Academy Strategic Plan Desired Outcome of High Student Achievement Specific Outcome: 2,0 Graduate the maximum number of students with an IE Diploma on an annual basis—On-going Goal Team Leader(s): Diploma Program Coordinator 2.1 80%of graduates achieve the IB Diploma by 2015 11.1 Students will achieve at a level that exceeds the national average relative to other IB schools 2.2 90%will test for the complete panel of Diploma Program exams,Estimated Completion Date: Spring, 2011 The May 2010 IB Diploma Programme Statistical Bulletin has not yet been published, so data from the May 2009 IB Diploma Programme Statistical Bulletin is currently being used for comparison in some areas. 87.5%of the 2010 Senior Class sat for the full diploma. This is just below the 2011 strategic plan projection of 90%of all WA students participating in the full diploma program, The DP program should meet or exceed this projection during the 2011 examination session. The 2010 DP students achieved a 57.1%diploma rate,which is below both the WA faculty predictions and the 2009 world statistics. Faculty predictions were based upon student performance within the individual courses. #WA Seniors #WA Diploma Candidates %WA Students Diploma Students #Diplomas Received WA Diploma Rate % Faculty Predicted ­Diploma Rate(%) 2009 World Diploma Rate(% 2010 24 21 87.5 12 57.1 (12/21) 71.4(15/21) 78.7 87.5%of the 2010 Senior Class sat for the full diploma. This is just below the 2011 strategic plan projection of 90%of all WA students participating in the full diploma program, The DP program should meet or exceed this projection during the 2011 examination session. The 2010 DP students achieved a 57.1%diploma rate,which is below both the WA faculty predictions and the 2009 world statistics. Faculty predictions were based upon student performance within the individual courses. 3) The 2010 DP students had relatively little experience in studying and taking high stakes exams. All DP teachers are expected to give assessments that use the same types of questions and rubrics found in DP assessments. However,this does not directly address how students prepare for high stakes exams based on two years of curriculum. There is a need for more preparation in this area. 4) In retrospect,there was observable distraction or lack of focus by many 2010 DP students throughout the spring semester. This is not unusual for seniors at most high schools,but it must be held in check for DP seniors. Student motivation for DP seniors is a major factor and must be in the forefront of our planning. As we know, DP results are posted well after college acceptance. This creates areal challenge in maintaining student focus and motivation. Asa school,WA faculty and staff must continually find new ways to motivate DP students who are experiencing the pressures of graduation and high stakes assessment. 5) In some areas,we are missing the mark, but this is not uncommon for first year DP teachers. This will be rectified as teachers make adjustments from year to year, The only experienced DP teachers on staff are Mr. Stoyanoff and Ms. Morales, so we have to allow time for the teachers to learn from the feedback provided by IB. In this light,we should continue to evaluate our practices and make changes as needed. Teachers have been made aware of the results and are currently making adjustments for this next academic year. 2010 Diploma Recipients versus Non-recipients 2010 WA Mean WA Mean #of subjects %of students %of students %EE Diploma Points Course Grade passed(out of 6) with 1 or more with 2 or more with C or better Scored scores_<2 scores�2 Diploma 30.6 4.89 5.42 0.00 0.00 75.0 Reci Tents Non-Recipients 19.0 3.07 2.10 78.0 33.0 45.0 %TOK I Mean Bonus with C or better I Points 92.0 1 1.25 45.0 1 0.56 The above table shows a relatively huge performance gap between the DP students who received the diploma and those who did not. The 2010 diploma recipients achieved above the 2009 World statistics in mean diploma points scored,mean course grade, and mean bonus points. The 2010 non-recipients were well below both the 2010 WA diploma recipient and 2009 world statistics. Also,the2010 Diploma recipients on average passed most of their DP course exams,whereas non-recipients on average only passed 2 course exams. In addition, 2010 diploma recipients scored 3 or better on all course exams,whereas non-recipients had a fairly high instance of scoring a 2 or even a 1 within a particular subject area. This performance gap is also evident in both the EE and TOK. It is clear that the majority of 2010 DP students were very successful in earning the diploma,whereas non-recipients simply fell way short of the mark. The reasons stated above help to explain this gap,but we need to realize that every class is different. K3 2010 DP Course Statistics Group 2010 Subject WA Predicted Mean Course Grade WA Mean Course Grade World Mean Course Grade WA versus World Mean Course Grade Recipient Mean Course Grade Non-recipient Mean Course Grade Recipient versus Non-recipient Mean Course grade I HL English Al 4.26 4.30 4.71 -0.41 5.08 5.58 n/a 144 +1.64 2 SL Spanish B SL Spanish ab initio 4.15 2.00 4.80 2.00 4.79 4.91 +0.01 -2.91 3.63 2.00 +1.95 n/a 3 HL History 4.61 4.09 4.72 -0.63 5.00 3.22 +1.55 4 HL Biology SL Biology 4.60 4.00 4.05 3.00 4.18 4.29 -0.08 -1.29 4.83 n/a 3.50 4.50 4.10 6.00 5.14 accurately predict overall in class, so 2.38 3.00 +2,45 n/a 4 SL Chemistry 4.00 2.90 3.92 -1.02 2.17 +1.33 5 SL Math Studies 3.56 3.56 4.75 -1.19 3.33 +1.17 5 SL Mathematics 5.38 3.69 4.48 -0.79 2.33 +1,77 6 HL Visual Arts SL Visual Arts 6.00 5.60 4.50 4.70 4.92 4.49 -0.42 +0.21 3.00 4.00 +3.00 +1.14 Faculty are so many performance predictions were a bit uncontrolled variables with faculty predictions. off. However,this was that can determine The faculty a new experience for the final score. Faculty will work to establish most of the faculty. predictions are based a better standard for making It is very difficult to upon student performance predictions. student performance, there is a need to better because there align classroom 4) DP faculty need to work to continually keep students motivated throughout the year. This can be achieved through better scheduling of all DP components and extra- curricular activities. Also,we can develop activities that bring DP students together and provide support throughout the year. For example, group CAS projects, extended essay workshops in the summer, and more structured tutoring prior to examination. 5) WA needs to offer more opportunities for DP students to prepare for high stakes exams. We will utilize end of the semester exams as mock exams to identify strengths and weaknesses and predict student performance. Another tool that we have at our disposal to better prepare students for DP exams is the AP. By giving students increased access to supplemental AP exams in earlier grades,we can provide real experience in high stakes examination and in turn better prepare students for DP assessment. All of these recommendations will be addressed at the first DP faculty meeting of the new academic year. As a result,the DP faculty will work to make all necessary adjustments and in turn develop a plan for continuous improvement. Macroeconomics 2 7 3 2 14 64.3 85.7 55.0 +30.7 3.64 2.80 +0.84 World History 1 3 4 0.00 25.0 50.2 -25.2 2.25 2.63 -0.38 Totals 8 20 9 8 9 54 Most notably, WA students taking AP English Language and Composition performed at a very high level with a 100%pass rate with 75%of the students scoring a 4 or 5. This is also true for AP Macroeconomics,where students achieved an 85.7%pass rate with a 64.3%of the students scoring a 4 or 5. For AP biology, students were just above the national AP averages. This should improve with better test preparation prior to the examination session. WA students did not perform well on AP Calculus AB and AP World History, but these courses were not actively preparing students for the exams. Also,three WA students qualify for AP Scholar(granted to students who receive scores of 3 or higher on three or more AP Exams), This is a great honor for any student, and it will serve well on any college application. AP scholar notifications will come out in September. Based upon these results,there are three recommendations: 1) If we continue to offer AP assessment options,there is a need to better integrate these curricular expectations within WA courses. 2) Also,teachers teaching in these areas need to attend AP training. 3) In addition,WA should further develop a system that prepares students for AP assessment in other areas provided that it does not conflict with the implementation of MYP or DP curricula. F7 �' • - - - M Premium Parking(Students) 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Estimated#of student drivers 80 100 120 120 120 Estimated#of staff drivers 50 55 55 55 55 90% $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 Premium Parking(Students) Lot Parking(Students) 125 125 125 125 125 Premium Parking(Staff) 40 40 40 40 40 Add Ons: Assigned Spot w/name 40 40 40 40 40 Customized Spot(ability to paint) 80 80 80 80 80 Premium Parking(Students) 10% $ 1,400 10% $ 1,750 10% $ 2,100 10% $ 2,100 10% $ 2,100 Lot Parking(Students) 90% 9,000 90% 11,250 90% 13,500 90% 13,500 90% 13,500 Premium Parking(Staff) 50% 1,000 50% 1,100 50% 1,100 50% 1,100 50% 1,100 Add Ons: Assigned Spot w/name 25% 800 25% 1,000 25% 1,200 25% 1,200 25% 1,200 Customized Spot(ability to paint) 10% 640 10% 800 10% 960 10% 960 10% 960 Total Revenue $ 12,840 $ 15,900 $ 18,860 $ 18,860 $ 18,860 Balance Due to Town: $79,432 $ 66,592 $ 50,692 $ 31,832 $ 12,972 $ (5,888) Assumptions: 1. 90%of students will pay for standard parking. 2. 10%of students will pay for premium parking. 3. 50%of staff will pay for assigned parking. 4. 25%of students will pay for assigned parking. 5. 8 students will pay for customized parking. Expenditures paild by the Town on behalf of the Academy Estimated Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget FY 03/04 FY 04/06 FY OS/06 I FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 EY 09/11} 100 43337 17 Contract Exterminator $ 550 $ 2,603 $ 594 $ 2,491 $ 863 $ 2,260 $ 5,000 100 43338 17 Contract Mechanical Maint - 5,471 6,062 4,764 10,292 9,889 10,500 100 43339 17 Contract Sweeping/Washing 148 - - 79 - 1,000 100 43340 17 Contract Irrigation Maintenance 4,970 5,708 8,065 10,842 2,054 11,000 100 43341 17 Contract Window Cleaning 545 603 - 2,700 - 3,000 100 43342 17 Contract Carpet Cleaning - 1,605 2,260 75 - - 100 43345 17 Contract Janitorial Service 113 38,472 35,470 3,135 - - - 100 43346 17 Contract Building Maint - 7,500 29,488 8,735 15,540 8,951 16,000 100 43347 17 Contract HVAC Maint 7,994 9,704 10,937 7,977 11,693 17,000 100 43348 17 Contract Landscape-Civic - 27,179 30,278 27,689 35,424 33,771 44,500 100 43350 17 Contract Security Monitor - - 809 891 937 927 1,900 100 43351 17 Contract Wastewater Treatment - 1,570 269 1,252 1,861 413 11600 100 43352 17 Contract Electrical/Lighting - 11,500 5,625 5,625 7,680 16,791 17,600 100 43353 17 Contract Sanitation/Waste Removal - 313 1,839 380 1,638 1,439 1,245 100 43354 17 Contract Security Maint - 9,255 9,000 - - - 5,000 100 43405 17 Computer Hardware/Software - - - - 1,623 1,025 1,200 100 44210 17 Facility Supplies 2,488 5,559 5,325 984 15 88 330 100 44212 17 Building Supplies - 1,391 2,320 1,502 3,935 2,908 3,588 100 44213 17 Electrical Supplies 691 450 6,335 4,771 1,597 5,000 100 44216 17 Ground Supplies 2,295 2,557 3,244 839 3,723 5,100 100 44217 17 HVAC Supplies 313 75 1,119 - - - 100 44218 17 Lamp/Bulb Supplies 2,665 5,786 3,524 5,199 3,388 4,500 100 44219 17 Mechanical Supplies 1,099 875 5,631 7,560 2,431 6,500 100 44220 17 Painting Supplies - 3,178 3,426 2,766 4,283 6,500 100 44224 17 Sanitation Supplies 1,288 - - - 2,000 2,000 100 44225 17 Water Treatment Supplies 1,158 445 1,163 1,873 373 2,500 100 44306 17 Grounds Maintenance - - 165 12,995 16,703 16,000 100 45901 17 Audio Visual R&M 977 1,352 3,469 5,968 2,728 6,000 100 45902 17 Electrical R&M 3,532 1,131 2,113 490 1,911 5,500 100 45903 17 Elevator R&M 683 1,200 1,375 725 910 1,500 100 45904 17 Plumbing R&M 2,254 2,465 8,534 1,782 10,034 10,000 100 45905 17 Fire Sprinkler R&M 2,688 1,648 6,627 4,410 563 3,500 100 45906 17 Fire/Life-AED R&M 145 2,203 9,666 8,092 7,805 5,900 100 45907 17 HVAC R&M 9,994 2,057 5,644 3,076 3,403 5,000 100 45908 17 Interior Building R&M 486 2,319 5,810 15,565 1,325 6,000 100 45909 17 Building Exterior R&M 105 254 10,558 4,972 4,750 6,000 100 45910 17 Mechanical R&M 40 703 26 5,534 6,291 5,000 100 46150 17 Licenses/Registrations - 180 180 90 65 217 250 Total 0&M Expenses only for Dept 17 (no prr or capital) 3,199 180,932 205,605 170,862 213,980 193,089 277,525 300 46135 00 Bank Service Charges - 300 830 830 3,630 1,130 1,500 300 48840 00 Debt Service Principal - 350,000 470,000 395,000 515,000 525,000 300 48850 00 Debt Service Interest 1,027,804 1,027,804 863,826 920,314 985,457 973,250 Transpdrtatian / Parking Fund Revenues Parking Fees Transportation Fees Total Revenul Expenditures Bus Operations (Fuel/Supplies} Total Expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (under)Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) Net Changes in Fund Balance Fund Balance, Beginning Vm-anfVQQI.anA,a Fndinty tAeeitFnPdI FY 10/11 12,84 0 �04 20,000 000 WIMI RE WESTLAKE ACADEMY COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXFENDTTURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE ALL G VERNMEN'TAL FUNDS For the Year Ending August 31,2011 Adapted Estimated Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 REVENUES Local Revenues $ 538,992 $ 555,464 $ 678,919 $ 585,381 Federal Program Revenues 56,134 119,976 198,427 143,029 State Program Revenues 3,163,129 3,637,109 3,665,938 3,964,371 Total Revenues $ 3,758,255 $ 4,312,549 $ 4,543,285 $ 4,692,781 EXPENDITURES(BY FUNCTION) 11 -Instructional 2,120,372 2,452,007 2,617,152 2,595,282 12 -Resources&Media 62,513 91,303 89,689 93,256 13 -Staff Development 36,973 67,405 119,989 136,250 21 -Instructional Leadership 11,660 92,034 94,189 133,415 23 -School Leadership 179,554 210,441 253,382 298,877 31 -Guidance&Counseling 163,575 153,340 156,431 164,757 33 -Health Services 58,845 53,813 53,561 54,529 35 -Food Services 15,448 9,018 8,716 9,700 36 -CoCurricular/Extracurricular Activities 111,738 108,220 93,252 114,098 41 -Administrative 527,000 272,714 303,049 279,300 51 -Maintenance&Operations 279,485 300,156 300,048 546,560 53 -Data Processing 88,720 140,404 167,128 158,851 61 -Community Services 66,822 64,858 64,946 64,949 71 -Debt Service 82,991 42,000 41,496 - Total Expenditures 3,805,696 4,057,713 4,363,029 4,649,822 Expenditures (47,441) 254,836 180,255 42,959 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES) 79- Other Resources 117,640 - 86,432 89- Other Uses (200,000) (100,000) (100,000) (99,272) Total Other Financing Sources(Uses) (82,360) (100,000) (100,000) (12,840) NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE (129,801) 154,836 80,255 30,119 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING 634,454 504,653 504,653 584,908 FUND BALANCE,ENDING 504,653 659,489 584,908 615,027 Assigned-Uniform/Equipment Replacement 7,884 14,838 Assigned-Hudson Foundation Grants 62,000 Assigned-Athletics - Assigned-Technology/FF&E Replacement 100,000 100,000 FUND BALANCE,ASSIGNED $ 504,653 $ 559,489 $ 515,024 $ 500,190 43 WEST LAKE ACADEMY COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE GENERALFUND For the Year Ending August 31,2011 Adopted Estimated Proposed Actual Budget Budget Budget FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 REVENUES Local Revenues $ 538,992 $ 555,464 $ 564,919 $ 585,381 State Program Revenues 3,122,653 3,617,405 3,646,234 3,944,632 Total Revenues $ 3,661,645 $ 4,172,869 $ 4,211,154 $ 4,530,013 EXPENDITURES(BY FUNCTION) 11 -Instructional $ 2,028,112 $ 2,318,077 $ 2,404,771 $ 2,438,264 12 -Resources&Media 62,513 91,303 89,689 93,256 13 -Staff Development 32,623 61,655 62,239 68,500 21 -Instructional Leadership 11,660 92,034 94,189 133,415 23 -School Leadership 179,554 210,441 253,382 298,877 31 -Guidance&Counseling 163,575 153,340 156,431 164,757 33 -Health Services 58,845 53,813 53,561 54,529 35 -Food Services 15,448 9,018 8,716 9,700 36 -CoCurricular/Extracurricular Activities 111,738 108,220 93,252 114,098 41 -Administrative 527,000 272,714 303,049 279,300 51 -Maintenance&Operations 279,485 300,156 300,048 546,560 53 -Data Processing 88,720 140,404 167,128 158,851 61 -Community Services 66,822 64,858 64,946 64,949 71 -Debt Service 82,991 42,000 41,496 - Total Expenditures 3,709,086 3,918,033 4,092,898 4,425,054 Expenditures $ (47,441) $ 254,836 $ 118,255 $ 104,959 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES) 79-Other Resources 117,640 - - 86,432 89-Other Uses (200,000) (100,000) (100,000) (99,272) Total Other Financing Sources(Uses) (82,360) (100,000) (100,000) (12,840) NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE (129,801) 154,836 18,255 92,119 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING 634,454 504,653 504,653 522,908 FUND BALANCE,ENDING 504,653 659,489 522,908 615,027 Assigned-Uniforms/Equipment Replacement 2,332 11,846 7,884 14,838 Assigned-Athletics - 3,252 - - Assigned-Technology/FF&E Replacement - 127,822 - 100,000 FUND BALANCE,UNASSIGNED $ 502,321 $ 519,821 $ 515,024 $ 500,190 46 WESTLAKE ACADEMY COMBINING S'TAT'EMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE GENERALFUND For the Year Ending August 31,2011 Proposed FY 10/11 197 198 199 Total Transportation/ Athletic General General Parking Fund Activities Fund Fund FY 10/11 FY 10/11 FY 10/11 FY 10/11 REVENUES Local Revenues $ 32,840 $ 51,953 $ 500,588 $ 585,381 State Program Revenues - - 3,944,632 3,944,632 Total Revenues 32,840 51,953 4,445,220 4,530,013 EXPENDITURES(BY FUNCTION) 11 -Instructional 10,000 - 2,428,264 2,438,264 12 -Resources&Media - - 93,256 93,256 13 -Staff Development - - 68,500 68,500 21 -InstructionalLeadership - - 133,415 133,415 23 -School Leadership - - 298,877 298,877 31 -Guidance&Counseling - - 164,757 164,757 33 -Health Services - - 54,529 54,529 35 -Food Services - - 9,700 9,700 36 -CoCu rricu la r/Extracu rricu la r Activities 10,000 38,000 66,098 114,098 41 -Administrative - - 279,300 279,300 51 -Maintenance&Operations - - 546,560 546,560 53 -Data Processing - - 158,851 158,851 61 -Community Services - - 64,949 64,949 71 -Debt Service - - - - Total Expenditures 20,000 38,000 4,367,054 4,425,054 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over(Under) 12,840 13,953 78,166 104,959 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES) 79 -Other Resources - 86,432 86,432 89 -Other Uses (12,840) (7,000) (79,432) (99,272) Total Other Financing Sources(Uses) (12,840) (7;000) 7,000 (12,840) NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - 6,953 85,166 92,119 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING - 7,884 515,024 522,908 FUND BALANCE,ENDING - 14,838 600,190 615,027 Assigned-Uniform/Equipment Replacement - 14,838 - 14,838 Assigned-Athletics - - - - Assigned-Technology/FF&E Replacement - - 100,000 100,000 FUND BALANCE,UNASSIGNED $ - $ - $ 500,190 $ 500,190 47 WES'TLAKE ACADEME' STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE GENERAL FUND- 1 9 For the Year Ending August 31,2011 Variance Est Adopted Estimated Proposed FY 09-10 Audited Budget Budget Budget Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 10/11 REVENUES Local Revenues $ 506,249 $ 507,458 $ 519,966 $ 500,588 $ (19,378) State Program Revenues 3,122,653 3,617,405 3,646,234 3,944,632 298,397 Total Revenues $ 3,628,902 $ 4,124,863 $ 4,166,201 $ 4,445,220 $ 279,019 EXPENDITURES(BY FUNCTION) 11 -Instructional $ 2,028,112 $ 2,318,077 $ 2,404,771 $ 2,428,264 $ 23,493 12 -Resources&Media 62,513 91,303 89,689 93,256 3,567 13 -Staff Development 32,623 61,655 62,239 68,500 6,261 21 -Instructional Leadership 11,660 92,034 94,189 133,415 39,226 23 -School Leadership 179,554 210,441 253,382 298,877 45,495 31 -Guidance&Counseling 163,575 153,340 156,431 164,757 8,325 33 -Health Services 58,845 53,813 53,561 54,529 968 35 -Food Services 15,448 9,018 8,716 9,700 983 36 -CoCurricular/Extracurricular Activities 81,327 54,319 53,851 66,098 12,246 41 -Administrative 527,000 272,714 303,049 279,300 (23,749) 51 -Maintenance&Operations 279,485 300,156 300,048 546,560 246,512 53 -Data Processing 88,720 140,404 167,128 158,851 (8,277) 61 -Community Services 66,822 64,858 64,946 64,949 3 71 -Debt Service 82,991 42,000 41,496 - (41,496) Total Expenditures 3,678,675 3,864,132 4,053,498 4,367,054 313,556 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over(Under) Expenditures $ (49,773) $ 260,731 $ 112,703 $ 78,166 $ (34,537) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES) 79-Other Resources 117,640 - - 86,432 86,432 89-Other Uses (200,000) (100,000) (100,000) (79,432) 20,568 Total Other Financing Sources(Uses) (82,360) (100,000) (100,000) 7,000 107,000 NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE (132,133) 160,731 12,703 85,166 72,463 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING 634,454 502,321 502,321 515,024 12,703 FUND BALANCE,ENDING 502,321 663,052 515,024 600,190 85,166 Assigned-Technology/FF&E Replacement - 127,822 - 100,000 100,000 FUND BALANCE,UNASSIGNED $ 502,321 $ 516,569 $ 515,024 $ 500,190 $ (14,834) 50