HomeMy WebLinkAboutCritical Challenges Critical Choices Presentation“Critical Challenges, Critical Choices”
The Town of Westlake
Proposed 2009 - 2010 Budget
April 12, 2013
Introduction
•$12.4 million FY 2009-2010 Budget Premises:
–Provide basic, but high quality, Town services
–Continued decline in sales tax revenue
necessitates the use of some fund balance in the
General Fund to balance the budget
–Continued support for the Westlake Academy
–No Town ad valorem/property tax levy
–Proposing only self-funded capital improvement
projects, Utility Fund projects, and the Water well
for the Academy.
Fund Balances
Fund Type Estimated Proposed Inc(Dec) Inc(Dec)
FY 08/09 FY 09/10 Percent Amount
General Fund $ 3,904,487 $ 3,119,934 -20% $ (784,553)
Special Revenue 2,439,379 1,863,922 -24% (575,457)
Debt Service Fund
-
- 0%
-
Capital 230,445 230,445 0%
-
Utility Fund 1,728,860 1,330,033 -23% (398,827)
Internal Services 100,000 100,000 0%
-
Total Fund Balance $ 8,403,172 $ 6,644,335 -21% $ (1,758,837)
Budget Preparation & Scrubbing
•Identified one-time revenue sources
•Service Level Adjustments were used to identify both:
–Maintain existing service levels
–Increased service levels
–Expanded or new services
•Reduced the Proposed FY 2009 – 2010 Budget 5% from the estimated FY 2008 – 2009 Budget
•Delayed most general government capital improvement projects unless funding is already in place
FY 08/09 Accomplishments
•Fidelity Regional Headquarters Phase II Completed
•Developed and adopted five year Strategic Plan
•Five year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) was compiled
•Began and Completed the Academy Arts & Sciences Center
•Positive results from the Town’s first DF survey
•Governmental Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Distinguished Budget Award
•GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
•The Westlake Wire went “Green”
•Westlake’s e-Tube went live
•Westlake Windows was launched
Critical Challenges, Critical Choices
•Current economic downturn has affected
Westlake, surrounding communities, the state,
and the nation
•Westlake is dependent upon sales tax, fees,
and permits for operating revenue, all of
which are volitional in nature
•Current conditions create a challenge for the
Town’s ability to meet service demands and
their associated costs
Governing & Managing for Outcomes
Strategic
Planning
CIP
Financial
Forecast
Budget
Performance
Measurement
Direction
Finders
Performance
Evaluations
Strategic Plan = Strategic Focus
•One of a kind community
–Inviting Neighborhoods
–We are Leaders
–Hospitality finds its home in Westlake
–Page 7
Strategic Plan SLA’s
•Included comprehensive plan update funding
•Recommended pursuing others, but consider
each as a budget amendment
Strategic Plan Outcome Strategy
•“Establish a strategy for achieving long term
financial sustainability for the Town
government, including Westlake Academy.”
–Use time wisely
–Citizen outreach & education is critical
Performance Measurement =
Accountability
–Key Results Areas Affected
–Program Description
–Trends
–Program Broad Goals
–Goals & Objectives for
coming FY
–Efficiency/Effectiveness
Measures
–Vision Point/Strategic Plan
Impacts
•“If you can’t measure it, you can’t evaluate it.” City of Olathe, KS
•“You measure what you treasure.” Tom Brymer
•Departmental Budgets Use:
Important Conversations
•High Performance Organizations
–Confront the brutal facts
–Never lose faith
- Jim Collins, Good to Great
•What are the brutal facts?
–Page 10
Critical Challenges, Critical Choices
•The Town’s five year forecast shows that the
Town’s revenue will be outpaced by expenses
in FY 12/13 without changes occurring:
–Increase in sales tax revenue
–Attracting another major corporate campus within
the next year
–Increasing the retail presence in Westlake
–Decreasing Town services
–Implementing other revenue streams
Financial Forecast Illustrates
the Challenge
-
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
FY 08/09
Estimated
FY 09/10
Proposed
FY 10/11
Projected
FY 11/12
Projected
FY 12/13
Projected
FY 13/14
Projected
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Revenues Expenditures
General Fund and
Visitor Fund
Balance Depleted
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
FY 08/09 Estimated FY 09/10 Proposed FY 10/11 Projected FY 11/12 Projected FY 12/13 Projected FY 13/14 Projected
General Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
FY 08/09 Estimated FY 09/10 Proposed FY 10/11 Projected FY 11/12 Projected FY 12/13 Projected FY 13/14 Projected
Visitor Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
FY 08/09 Estimated FY 09/10 Proposed FY 10/11 Projected FY 11/12 Projected FY 12/13 Projected FY 13/14 Projected
Utility Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
The Price of Government
(Osborne & Hutchinson)
•Getting a grip on the problem
–Is it short or long term? Is it driven by revenue or expenses, or both?
•Setting the Price of Government
–Determine how much citizens are willing to pay.
•Setting the Priorities of Government
–Deciding which results citizens value most.
•Setting the Price of each Priority
–Deciding how much the government will spend to produce each of these outcomes.
•Purchasing the Priorities
–Deciding how best to produce the desired results at the price citizens are willing to pay.
Getting a Grip on the Problem
•Financial forecast show the problem is
revenue driven
–Revenues are not diverse, not on-going and
declining
–This is a short and long term problem
General Fund Revenue
•Amount of GF revenue that is one-time income:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sales Tax (Situs)
(43%), 350,000
Permits and
Fees (9%),
2,547,570
On-Going
(49%),
2,890,166
General Fund Revenue FY 08/09 Estimated
On-Going (49%)
Permits and
Fees (9%)
Sales Tax (Situs)
(43%)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sales Tax (Situs) (12%),
452,600
Permits and Fees
(13%), 505,220
On-Going
(73%),
2,795,021
General Fund Revenue FY 09/10 Proposed
On-Going (73%)
Transfer In from
UF (1%)
Permits and
Fees (13%)
Sales Tax (Situs)
(12%)
General Fund Revenue
•Composition of Sales Tax:
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
Sales Composition Total General Fund Sales Tax
1,000,000
-
452,600
1,452,600
Situs
On-Going
Setting the Price of Government
•The DirectionFinders survey provided feedback on what the citizens are willing to pay for and the levels of service desired
–Public Safety
•51% willing to pay more to maintain current levels
•62% not willing to pay more for expanded service levels
–Maintenance of streets and drainage
•50% willing to pay more to maintain current levels
•63% not willing to pay more for expanded service levels
–Parks, trails, and recreation programs
•46% willing to pay more to maintain current levels
•64% not willing to pay more for expanded service levels
Setting the Priorities of Government
•The DirectionFinders survey also provided
feedback on what citizen priorities are
–77% selected public safety as what they felt was
most important
–41% selected Westlake Academy as what they felt
was most important
–33% selected maintenance of Town streets and
the quality of water utility services as what they
felt was most important
Setting the Price of each Priority
•Council has adopted a five year strategic plan
that will be used as a guideline
–This document will be updated annually to reflect
the continued desires of the Council and
community
Purchasing the Priorities
•The Town will need to evaluate the best
delivery options available.
•Ceilings may need to be placed on expenses.
Westlake Academy Expenditures
Contained in the Municipal Budget
Total Budget FY 09/10 $12,435,855 100%
Debt Service $1,499,750 12.06%
Direct Expenses $248,638 2.10%
Indirect Costs $339,469 2.73%
Total Westlake Academy Costs $2,087,857 16.89%
Positioning Ourselves
for the Future
•What are the “core” services the Town should be
offering and how best do we accomplish that?
•What level of financial support can we provide for
Westlake Academy versus their ability to pursue
other sources of funds, via the foundation or
other means?
•How best do we engage the citizens of Westlake
in this critical conversation?
•What do we want Westlake to be and look like in
50 years?
What is the critical challenge
and choice?
•Realigning the Town’s business model
•Riding “a different horse”
- Osborne & Hutchinson
Closing Comments
•E + R = O
•Problem or an opportunity?
Osborne & Hutchinson
•“they (citizens) want government to provide
what only the public sector can provide…But
they want their money’s worth. They want
value for dollars. When they can’t get it, they
often opt for tax cuts and private services.
When they do get value form public
institutions, however, they are often willing to
invest in them.”
Our Challenge
•Making sure Westlake residents have
confidence in us, are getting value, so they are
willing to invest in Town services.
Citizen Outreach is Critical
•Acknowledgements
•Another budget workshop on 9/21
•Questions